ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Novel Multi-IMU Tight Coupling Pedestrian Localization Exploiting Biomechanical Motion Constraints.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Multi-IMU Tight Coupling Pedestrian Localization Exploiting Biomechanical Motion Constraints.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we present a novel tight coupling inertial localization system which simultaneously processes the measurements of two inertial measurement units (IMUs) mounted on the leg, namely the upper thigh and the front part of the foot. Moreover, the proposed system exploits motion constraints of each leg link; that is, the thigh and the foot. To derive these constraints, we carry out a motion tracking experiment to collect both ground truth data and inertial measurements from IMUs mounted on the leg. The performance of the tight coupling system is assessed with a data set of approximately 10 h. The evaluation shows that the average 2D-position error of the proposed tight coupling system is at least 50% better than the average 2D-position error of two state-of-the-art systems, whereas the average height error of the tight coupling system is at least 75% better than the average height error of the two state-of-the-art systems. In this work, we improve the accuracy of the position estimation by introducing biomechanical constraints in an inertial localization system. This article allows to observe, for the first time, heading errors of an inertial localization system by using only inertial measurements and without the need for using maps or repeating totally or partially the walked trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.