Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32962156›Full record

ArticleBiology2020

A Putative Prophylactic Solution for COVID-19: Development of Novel Multiepitope Vaccine Candidate against SARS-COV-2 by Comprehensive Immunoinformatic and Molecular Modelling Approach.

Hafiz Muzzammel Rehman, Muhammad Usman Mirza, Mian Azhar Ahmad, Mahjabeen Saleem, Matheus Froeyen, Sarfraz Ahmad, Roquyya Gul, Huda Ahmed Alghamdi, Muhammad Shahbaz Aslam, Muhammad Sajjad and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. BCEDB: a linear B-cell epitopes database for SARS-CoV-2.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Hafiz Muzzammel RehmanInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman MirzaDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Medicinal Chemistry, University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9120-2414
Mian Azhar AhmadDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Health Sciences, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.
Mahjabeen SaleemInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.
Matheus FroeyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Medicinal Chemistry, University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sarfraz AhmadDrug Design and Development Research Group (DDDRG), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0059-477X
Roquyya GulFaculty of Life Sciences, Gulab Devi Educational Complex, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-8421
Huda Ahmed AlghamdiDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5973-8948
Muhammad Shahbaz AslamInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad SajjadSchool of Biological Sciences, University of the Punjab, Quaid e Azam Campus, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6739-5436
Munir Ahmad BhinderDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Health Sciences, Lahore 54590, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-6295
University of the Punjab · PKRega Institute for Medical Research · BEGovernment of Pakistan · PKKing Khalid University · SAUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore · PKUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) R.G.P-2/49/40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of 2019-novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes severe respiratory infection (COVID-19) has spread in China, and the World Health Organization has declared it a pandemic. However, no approved drug or vaccines are available, and treatment is mainly supportive and through a few repurposed drugs. The urgency of the situation requires the development of SARS-CoV-2-based vaccines. Immunoinformatic and molecular modelling are time-efficient methods that are generally used to accelerate the discovery and design of the candidate peptides for vaccine development. In recent years, the use of multiepitope vaccines has proved to be a promising immunization strategy against viruses and pathogens, thus inducing more comprehensive protective immunity. The current study demonstrated a comprehensive in silico strategy to design stable multiepitope vaccine construct (MVC) from B-cell and T-cell epitopes of essential SARS-CoV-2 proteins with the help of adjuvants and linkers. The integrated molecular dynamics simulations analysis revealed the stability of MVC and its interaction with human Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which trigger an innate and adaptive immune response. Later, the in silico cloning in a known pET28a vector system also estimated the possibility of MVC expression in

Indexed as

COVID-19molecular modelingmultiepitope vaccineSARS-CoV-2spike protein

Identifiers

PMID32962156
PMCPMC7563440
OpenAlexW3011556382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.