Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32962098›Full record

ReviewBiology2020

Review on the Computational Genome Annotation of Sequences Obtained by Next-Generation Sequencing.

Girum Fitihamlak Ejigu, Jaehee Jung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regions Enriched with Reverse Complement Triplets in Bacterial Genomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Metagenomic Assembly and Gene Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  15. A fixed mutation in the respiratory complex I impairs mitochondrial bioenergetics in the endangered Apennine brown bear.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Protein Structural Phylogenetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Girum Fitihamlak EjiguDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin-si 17058, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-653X
Jaehee JungDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin-si 17058, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0932-3039

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) NRF-2019R1A2C1084308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has made it easier to obtain genome-wide sequence data and it has shifted the research focus into genome annotation. The challenging tasks involved in annotation rely on the currently available tools and techniques to decode the information contained in nucleotide sequences. This information will improve our understanding of general aspects of life and evolution and improve our ability to diagnose genetic disorders. Here, we present a summary of both structural and functional annotations, as well as the associated comparative annotation tools and pipelines. We highlight visualization tools that immensely aid the annotation process and the contributions of the scientific community to the annotation. Further, we discuss quality-control practices and the need for re-annotation, and highlight the future of annotation.

Indexed as

ab initio annotationfunctional annotationhomology-based annotationstructural annotation

Identifiers

PMID32962098
PMCPMC7565776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.