Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32961702›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Constructing and Communicating COVID-19 Stigma on Twitter: A Content Analysis of Tweets during the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Yachao Li, Sylvia Twersky, Kelsey Ignace, Mei Zhao, Radhika Purandare, Breeda Bennett-Jones, Scott R Weaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Combating Misinformation by Sharing the Truth: a Study on the Spread of Fact-Checks on Social Media.Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Irrational Beliefs about COVID-19: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yachao LiDepartment of Communication Studies, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8268-1935
Sylvia TwerskyDepartment of Public Health, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.
Kelsey IgnaceDepartment of Public Health, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.
Mei ZhaoDepartment of Public Health, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.
Radhika PurandareDepartment of Communication Studies, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.
Breeda Bennett-JonesDepartment of Communication Studies, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.
Scott R WeaverSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on stigma communication about COVID-19 on Twitter in the early stage of the outbreak, given the lack of information and rapid global expansion of new cases during this period. Guided by the model of stigma communication, we examine four types of message content, namely mark, group labeling, responsibility, and peril, that are instrumental in forming stigma beliefs and sharing stigma messages. We also explore whether the presence of misinformation and conspiracy theories in COVID-19-related tweets is associated with the presence of COVID-19 stigma content. A total of 155,353 unique COVID-19-related tweets posted between December 31, 2019, and March 13, 2020, were identified, from which 7000 tweets were randomly selected for manual coding. Results showed that the peril of COVID-19 was mentioned the most often, followed by mark, responsibility, and group labeling content. Tweets with conspiracy theories were more likely to include group labeling and responsibility information, but less likely to mention COVID-19 peril. Public health agencies should be aware of the unintentional stigmatization of COVID-19 in public health messages and the urgency to engage and educate the public about the facts of COVID-19.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusSocial MediaSocial StigmaCommunicationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHealth CommunicationHumansInformation DisseminationPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2content analysiscoronavirus 2019COVID-19model of stigma communicationstigmaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID32961702
PMCPMC7557581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.