Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32961546›Full record

Observational studyPediatric research2021

The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation index for acute procedural pain assessment in preterm infants.

Julie Gendras, Pauline Lavenant, Iona Sicard-Cras, Maëlys Consigny, Laurent Misery, Kanwaljeet J S Anand, Jacques Sizun, Jean-Michel Roué

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02885051 (Comparative Analysis of a Behavioral Level, Skin Conductance and Heart Rate Variability in Assessing the Pain in Preterm Newborn), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02885051 naterminatednot on this map

Comparative Analysis of a Behavioral Level, Skin Conductance and Heart Rate Variability in Assessing the Pain in Preterm Newborn

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BrestRan2017 to 2018Enrolled91ConditionsPain, Preterm NewbornArmsRecording of skin conductance and heart rate variability.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Baseline NIPEEuropean journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Pain and heart rate variability in neonates receiving dexmedetomidine.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomarkers for assessing pain and pain relief in the neonatal intensive care unit.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie GendrasPôle de Femme, de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Brest, France.
Pauline LavenantPôle de Femme, de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Brest, France.
Iona Sicard-CrasPôle de Femme, de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Brest, France.
Maëlys ConsignyCentre d'Investigation Clinique 0502, Inserm, Brest, 29200, France.
Laurent MiseryLaboratoire Interactions Epithéliums Neurones, EA 4685, Faculté de médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, 29200, France.
Kanwaljeet J S AnandPain/Stress Neurobiology Lab, Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jacques SizunPôle de Femme, de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Brest, France.
Jean-Michel RouéPôle de Femme, de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Brest, France. jean-michel.roue@chu-brest.fr.
Université de Bretagne Occidentale · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRInserm · FRStanford University · US

Funding

Measuring Infant Pain Objectively using Sensor Fusion and Machine Learning AlgorithmsR41DA046983 · NIDA · AUTONOMOUS HEALTHCARE, INC. · PI GHOLAMI, BEHNOOD · 2018 to 2018
$225k
NIDA NIH HHS R41 DA046983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessments of pain in hospitalized preterm infants present a major challenge in improving the short- and long-term consequences associated with painful experiences. We evaluated the ability of the newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) index to detect acute procedural pain in preterm infants.

methodsDifferent painful and stressful interventions were prospectively observed in preterm infants born at 25 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks gestation. Pain responses were measured using the composite Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised (PIPP-R) scale, the NIPE index, and skin conductance responses (SCR). Outcome measures were correlations between the NIPE index, the PIPP-R score, and the SCR. Sensitivity/specificity analyses tested the accuracy of the NIPE index and SCR.

resultsTwo hundred and fifty-four procedures were recorded in 90 preterm infants. No significant correlation was found between PIPP-R and the NIPE index. PIPP-R and SCR were positively correlated (r = 0.27, P < 0.001), with stronger correlations for painful procedures (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and especially for skin-breaking procedures (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The NIPE index and SCR had high sensitivity and high negative predictive values to predict PIPP-R > 10, especially for skin-breaking painful procedures.

conclusionsWe found no significant correlation between the NIPE index and PIPP-R during routine painful or stressful procedures in preterm infants. IMPACT: Exposure to repetitive pain can lead to neurodevelopmental sequelae. Behavior-based pain scales have limited clinical utility, especially for preterm infants. New devices for monitoring physiological responses to pain have not been validated sufficiently in preterm infants. This study found that the NIPE index was not significantly correlated to the validated PIPP-R scale during acute procedural pain. Secondary analysis of this study showed that NIPE index and SCRs may help to exclude severe pain in preterm infants. In clinical practice, measurements of physiological parameters should be combined with behavior-based scales for multidimensional pain assessments.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAcute DiseaseHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPain MeasurementParasympathetic Nervous SystemProcedural PainProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32961546
OpenAlexW3088669203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.