Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32961402›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

NeuroMark: An automated and adaptive ICA based pipeline to identify reproducible fMRI markers of brain disorders.

Yuhui Du, Zening Fu, Jing Sui, Shuang Gao, Ying Xing, Dongdong Lin, Mustafa Salman, Anees Abrol, Md Abdur Rahaman, Jiayu Chen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 239 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 443 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. ΔBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Trial
  4. TE-aware state analysis and evolution in dynamic network connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuhui DuSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China; Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA. Electronic address: duyuhui@sxu.edu.cn.
Zening FuTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Jing SuiTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA; Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Centre for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Institute of Automation, CAS, China.
Shuang GaoChinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Centre for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Institute of Automation, CAS, China; School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
Ying XingSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Dongdong LinTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Mustafa SalmanTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA; School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.
Anees AbrolTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Md Abdur RahamanTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Jiayu ChenTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
L Elliot HongUniversity of Maryland, Center for Brain Imaging Research, Baltimore, USA.
Peter KochunovUniversity of Maryland, Center for Brain Imaging Research, Baltimore, USA.
Elizabeth A OsuchLawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Vince D CalhounTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA; School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Georgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNLawson Health Research Institute · CAShanxi University · CN

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI HANLON, FAITH MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
SOLAR-Eclipse Computational Tools for Imaging GeneticsR01EB015611 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KOCHUNOV, PETER V. · 2012 to 2024
$5.0M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Hybrid GPU/CPU Computing Resource to Support Connectomic and GenomicsS10OD023696 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KOCHUNOV, PETER V. · 2018 to 2018
$593k
CIHRNCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015611NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIH HHS S10 OD023696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many mental illnesses share overlapping or similar clinical symptoms, confounding the diagnosis. It is important to systematically characterize the degree to which unique and similar changing patterns are reflective of brain disorders. Increasing sharing initiatives on neuroimaging data have provided unprecedented opportunities to study brain disorders. However, it is still an open question on replicating and translating findings across studies. Standardized approaches for capturing reproducible and comparable imaging markers are greatly needed. Here, we propose a pipeline based on the priori-driven independent component analysis, NeuroMark, which is capable of estimating brain functional network measures from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data that can be used to link brain network abnormalities among different datasets, studies, and disorders. NeuroMark automatically estimates features adaptable to each individual subject and comparable across datasets/studies/disorders by taking advantage of the reliable brain network templates extracted from 1828 healthy controls as guidance. Four studies including 2442 subjects were conducted spanning six brain disorders (schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder) to evaluate validity of the proposed pipeline from different perspectives (replication of brain abnormalities, cross-study comparison, identification of subtle brain changes, and multi-disorder classification using identified biomarkers). Our results highlight that NeuroMark effectively identified replicated brain network abnormalities of schizophrenia across different datasets; revealed interesting neural clues on the overlap and specificity between autism and schizophrenia; demonstrated brain functional impairments present to varying degrees in mild cognitive impairments and Alzheimer's disease; and captured biomarkers that achieved good performance in classifying bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderBiomarkersBrainBrain MappingHumansBiomarkersBrain disordersfMRIIndependent component analysisNeuroMarkReproducible and comparable biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32961402
PMCPMC7509081
OpenAlexW3048396787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.