ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021
Primary immunization of meningococcal meningitis vaccine among children in Hangzhou, China, 2008-2017.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunity Dynamics ofVaccines · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough China's Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) provides two doses of group A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MPV-A) for children younger than 2 y, more self-paying group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (MCV-AC) has been used as an alternative to MPV-A, to prevent Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C (Men-C) earlier. We evaluated the pattern of MPV-A and MCV-AC utilization to provide evidence for China to upgrade the national meningococcal meningitis vaccination strategy.
methodsChildren born between 2008 and 2017 registered in Hangzhou's Immunization Information System (HZIIS) were included. Descriptive epidemiological methods were used to characterize the data. Adverse event following immunization (AEFI) was collected from Chinese national adverse event following immunization information system (CNAEFIIS) to compare the safety of MPV-A and MCV-AC.
resultsData of 1149,027 children from HZIIS were analyzed. The average immunization rate of meningococcal meningitis vaccine (MenV) was 97.50%. Percentages of children using MPV-A-only, MCV-AC-only, and MPV-A/MCV-AC sequential schedules were 68.20%, 29.73%, and 2.07%, respectively. The vaccination rate of MCV-AC-only increased by age and it was higher in resident children than migration children. The incidence rate of AEFI of MPV-A and MCV-AC was 53.36 per 100,000 and 62.13 per 100,000, respectively.
conclusionChildren in Hangzhou had high MenV coverage. MCV-AC-only schedule use increased by year and was higher in urban areas among locally born children. Both MPV-A and MCV-AC were safe for children, while MCV-AC could protect against Men-C more effectively. This supports the rationale to introduce MCV-AC into China's EPI system for free instead of MPV-A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.