Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960674›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

Renal cryoablation - a practical guide for interventional radiologists.

Matthew Seager, Shankar Kumar, Emma Lim, Graham Munneke, Steve Bandula, Miles Walkden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Percutaneous ablation of T1b renal tumors: a review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew SeagerInterventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-4341
Shankar KumarInterventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.
Emma LimInterventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.
Graham MunnekeInterventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.
Steve BandulaInterventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.
Miles WalkdenInterventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cryoablation is a treatment option for early stage renal cell carcinomas with excellent oncological outcomes and low morbidity. This review outlines the technique of renal cryoablation and provides a guide for interventional radiologists on setting up an integrated service within a renal cancer network multidisciplinary setting. Patient selection and preparation, together with the technical aspects which ensure optimal oncological outcomes and avoid collateral damage to adjacent organs are highlighted.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCryosurgeryHumansKidneyKidney NeoplasmsRadiology, InterventionalTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32960674
PMCPMC7934314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.