Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960495›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Trimodal therapy in T2-4aN0M0 bladder cancer--How to select the best candidate?

Ofer N Gofrit, Amichay Meirovitz, Stephen Frank, Igal Rabinovich, Hemda Luwisch, Vladimir Yutkin, Tzahi Neuman, Guy Hidas, Mordechai Duvdevani, Marc Wygoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A population-based analysis of patterns of care in patients with de novo muscle-invasive bladder cancer from Alberta, Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ofer N GofritDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8815-6488
Amichay MeirovitzDepartment of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7479-2926
Stephen FrankDepartment of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Igal RabinovichDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hemda LuwischDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Vladimir YutkinDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tzahi NeumanDepartment of Pathology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Guy HidasDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Mordechai DuvdevaniDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Marc WygodaDepartment of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reported results of trimodal treatment (TMT) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer vary widely. We attempted to characterize the profile of ideal candidates for this approach. Between 2000 and 2019, 105 patients (median age 78 years) with T2-4aN0M0 bladder cancer were treated with TMT and analyzed retrospectively. Mean radiotherapy dose was 62 Gy (SD 8.4). Ten pretreatment prognostic parameters were evaluated including tumor diameter on pre-TURBT CT. Multivariate analyses was performed and combination of parameters was studied. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 53 patients (50.5%) developed recurrence and 70 patients (67.7%) died. Death was disease-specific in 46 patients (65.7%). Tumor diameter was the most significant prognostic parameter with p < 0.0001 for overall, disease-specific and recurrence-free survivals. For every 1 cm increase in tumor diameter, the risk of disease-specific mortality increased by 1.57. Age, cisplatin eligibility and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were significant predictors of overall survival but not of disease-specific or recurrence-free survival. Patients who were cisplatin-eligible with a tumor diameter ≤3 cm had a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 79.2% as opposed to 33.9% in patients without one of these features (p < 0.001). When tumor diameter exceeded 5 cm (irrelevant of all other parameters), 5-year disease-specific survival rate was only 28.2%. Patient profiles can accurately predict response to TMT. In cisplatin-eligible patients with a tumor diameter ≤3 cm, TMT provides an excellent disease-specific survival rate. In patients with a tumor diameter >5 cm TMT renders unacceptably poor treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Decision-MakingCystectomyPatient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinDisease ProgressionDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinmuscle-invasive bladder cancerpatient selectiontrimodal therapytumor diameter

Identifiers

PMID32960495
PMCPMC7666756
OpenAlexW3087582891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.