Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960493›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2020

Antibody screening using a human iPSC-based blood-brain barrier model identifies antibodies that accumulate in the CNS.

Julia V Georgieva, Loukas I Goulatis, Charles C Stutz, Scott G Canfield, Hannah W Song, Benjamin D Gastfriend, Eric V Shusta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EnhancedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia V GeorgievaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Loukas I GoulatisDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Charles C StutzDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Scott G CanfieldDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Hannah W SongDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Benjamin D GastfriendDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Eric V ShustaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008349 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, BRIAN G · 1989 to 2019
$22.5M
Proteomic Evaluation of the Blood-Brain Barrier Receptor-Mediated TransportomeR01NS071513 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHUSTA, ERIC V · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008349NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains a significant obstacle for the development of neurological disease therapies. The low penetration of blood-borne therapeutics into the brain can oftentimes be attributed to the restrictive nature of the brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) that comprise the BBB. One strategy beginning to be successfully leveraged is the use of endogenous receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) systems as a means to shuttle a targeted therapeutic into the brain. Limitations of known RMT targets and their cognate targeting reagents include brain specificity, brain uptake levels, and off-target effects, driving the search for new and potentially improved brain targeting reagent-RMT pairs. To this end, we deployed human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived BMEC-like cells as a model BBB substrate on which to mine for new RMT-targeting antibody pairs. A nonimmune, human single-chain variable fragment (scFv) phage display library was screened for binding, internalization, and transcytosis across iPSC-derived BMECs. Lead candidates exhibited binding and internalization into BMECs as well as binding to both human and mouse BBB in brain tissue sections. Antibodies targeted the murine BBB after intravenous administration with one particular clone, 46.1-scFv, exhibiting a 26-fold increase in brain accumulation (8.1 nM). Moreover, clone 46.1-scFv was found to associate with postvascular, parenchymal cells, indicating its successful receptor-mediated transport across the BBB. Such a new BBB targeting ligand could enhance the transport of therapeutic molecules into the brain.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTranscytosisAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCells, CulturedDrug CarriersHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeptide LibrarySingle-Chain AntibodiesDrug CarriersPeptide LibrarySingle-Chain Antibodiesantibody‐mediated brain drug deliveryblood‐brain barriernicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

Identifiers

PMID32960493
PMCPMC7513543
OpenAlexW3046101522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.