Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960385›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2020

Discrimination of well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign lipoma on sonography: an uncontrolled retrospective study.

Naoko Shimamori, Tomonori Kishino, Naota Okabe, Takeshi Morii, Satsuki Matsushima, Satoko Yamasaki, Kouki Ohtsuka, Junji Shibahara, Hiroaki Ohnishi, Takashi Watanabe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ultrasound of palpable lesions: a pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naoko ShimamoriDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomonori KishinoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan. kishino@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-9781
Naota OkabeDepartment of Pathology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi MoriiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Satsuki MatsushimaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoko YamasakiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Kouki OhtsukaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Junji ShibaharaDepartment of Pathology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki OhnishiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi WatanabeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences (JP) R401010001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWell-differentiated liposarcoma, the most common subtype of liposarcoma, should be discriminated from benign lipoma. However, features on sonography for discriminating these two types of tumor have not been fully investigated. The present study was therefore aimed at clarifying differences in sonographic findings between well-differentiated liposarcoma and lipoma.

methodsThe study population comprised 23 cases of well-differentiated liposarcoma and 181 cases of lipoma. We investigated differences in sonographic appearance and pathological findings between the two types of tumor.

resultsWell-differentiated liposarcoma tended to develop more frequently in older patients and in the lower extremities including the gluteal region, compared with lipoma. Concerning sonographic findings, both tumors exhibited well-defined margins and heterogeneous internal echogenicity, including typical tiny striated hyperechoic lines. Well-differentiated liposarcoma was characterized by a higher frequency of the following findings compared with lipoma: (1) deep location, (2) irregular shape, (3) large diameter, (4) hyperechogenicity compared to surrounding tissue, and (5) presence of vascularity on Doppler sonography (p < 0.01 each). Notably, hyperechogenicity corresponded to the intermingled sclerosing component within the adipocytic component when sonographic findings were compared with those of pathology.

conclusionThe present study suggests that several sonographic findings including hyperechogenicity and presence of vascularity might be key features for discriminating well-differentiated liposarcoma from lipoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionButtocksDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLipomaLiposarcomaMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyDiscriminationLipomaLiposarcomaSonographyWell-differentiated

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.