ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Viability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions and After Baking White Pan Bread at Different Temperature and Time Regimes.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Similar Virulence Gene Repertoires but Distinct Stress Tolerance and Pathogenicity-Associated Phenotypes in RepresentativeMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Multilayer Double Emulsion Encapsulation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Current Advantages in the Application of Microencapsulation in Functional Bread Development.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the viability of encapsulated and un-encapsulated (free cell) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) in bread baked at different baking conditions (180 °C for 30 min, 220 °C for 20 min, and 250 °C for 15 min) and in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. The cell was encapsulated either with sodium alginate, singly or in combination with chitosan, cassava starch, and hi-maize resistant starch. There was complete loss of viability of un-encapsulated LGG after baking. Significantly (P < 0.05) higher viability was recorded for LGG encapsulated with sodium alginate + cassava starch + chitosan beads (SCCB) and sodium alginate + hi-maize resistant starch + chitosan beads (SHCB) compared to sodium alginate beads (SAB) and sodium alginate + cassava starch beads (SSB). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG encapsulated with SHCB gave the highest viability (P < 0.05) after subjection to simulated gastric and intestinal juices. The incorporation of LGG did not have significant (P < 0.05) influence on volume, specific volume, moisture, ash, fat, and fiber contents of bread. The lowest moisture content was obtained at baking condition of 180 °C for 30 min, while the highest value was at 250 °C for 15 min. Baking condition did not cause significant (P > 0.05) change in fat, ash, and carbohydrate content of bread. The encapsulation of LGG with multiple layers of encapsulating materials significantly preserved its viability during baking and in simulated gastrointestinal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.