Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960281›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Genome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Test in Children With Unexplained Medical Complexity.

Gregory Costain, Susan Walker, Maria Marano, Danielle Veenma, Meaghan Snell, Meredith Curtis, Stephanie Luca, Jason Buera, Danielle Arje, Miriam S Reuter and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory CostainDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan WalkerThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maria MaranoDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle VeenmaDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Meaghan SnellCentre for Genetic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Meredith CurtisCentre for Genetic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie LucaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jason BueraDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle ArjeDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Miriam S ReuterThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bhooma ThiruvahindrapuramThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brett TrostThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wilson W L SungThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ryan K C YuenGenetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David ChitayatDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roberto Mendoza-LondonoDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
D James StavropoulosCentre for Genetic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen W SchererThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christian R MarshallCentre for Genetic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ronald D CohnDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eyal CohenDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julia OrkinDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
M Stephen MeynDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robin Z HayeemsCentre for Genetic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASickKids Foundation · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Children with medical complexity (CMC) represent a growing population in the pediatric health care system, with high resource use and associated health care costs. A genetic diagnosis can inform prognosis, anticipatory care, management, and reproductive planning. Conventional genetic testing strategies for CMC are often costly, time consuming, and ultimately unsuccessful. Objective: To evaluate the analytical and clinical validity of genome sequencing as a comprehensive diagnostic genetic test for CMC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study of the prospective use of genome sequencing and comparison with standard-of-care genetic testing, CMC were recruited from May 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018, from a structured complex care program based at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. Recruited CMC had at least 1 chronic condition, technology dependence (child is dependent at least part of each day on mechanical ventilators, and/or child requires prolonged intravenous administration of nutritional substances or drugs, and/or child is expected to have prolonged dependence on other device-based support), multiple subspecialist involvement, and substantial health care use. Review of the care plans for 545 CMC identified 143 suspected of having an undiagnosed genetic condition. Fifty-four families met inclusion criteria and were interested in participating, and 49 completed the study. Probands, similarly affected siblings, and biological parents were eligible for genome sequencing. Exposures: Genome sequencing was performed using blood-derived DNA from probands and family members using established methods and a bioinformatics pipeline for clinical genome annotation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary study outcome was the diagnostic yield of genome sequencing (proportion of CMC for whom the test result yielded a new diagnosis). Results: Genome sequencing was performed for 138 individuals from 49 families of CMC (29 male and 20 female probands; mean [SD] age, 7.0 [4.5] years). Genome sequencing detected all genomic variation previously identified by conventional genetic testing. A total of 15 probands (30.6%; 95% CI 19.5%-44.6%) received a new primary molecular genetic diagnosis after genome sequencing. Three individuals had novel diseases and an additional 9 had either ultrarare genetic conditions or rare genetic conditions with atypical features. At least 11 families received diagnostic information that had clinical management implications beyond genetic and reproductive counseling. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that genome sequencing has high analytical and clinical validity and can result in new diagnoses in CMC even in the setting of extensive prior investigations. This clinical population may be enriched for ultrarare and novel genetic disorders. Genome sequencing is a potentially first-tier genetic test for CMC.

Indexed as

CanadaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSomatoform DisordersWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32960281
PMCPMC7509619
OpenAlexW3087462029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.