ArticleJAMA network open2020
Genome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Test in Children With Unexplained Medical Complexity.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Sequencing: Clinical Validation in Genetically Heterogeneous Disorders.Genes · 2025Article
- First-Tier Versus Last-Tier Trio Whole-Genome Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Pediatric-Onset Rare Diseases.Clinical genetics · 2025Article
- Implementing a consultation service for translating genomic research findings into the clinic: Lessons from the SickKids Genome Board.Paediatrics & child health · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical applications of and molecular insights from RNA sequencing in a rare disease cohort.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Analytical validation of germline small variant detection using long-read HiFi genome sequencing.Genome research · 2025Article
- Research trajectory of the mechanism of preeclampsia: a scientometric perspective.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Advancing long-read nanopore genome assembly and accurate variant calling for rare disease detection.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Exome and Genome Sequencing to Diagnose the Genetic Basis of Neonatal Hypotonia: An International Consortium Study.Neurology · 2025Article
- Leveraging cancer mutation data to inform the pathogenicity classification of germline missense variants.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Decoding complex inherited phenotypes in rare disorders: the DECIPHERD initiative for rare undiagnosed diseases in Chile.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Experience of the first adult-focussed undiagnosed disease program in Australia (AHA-UDP): solving rare and puzzling genetic disorders is ageless.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- An integrated clinical approach to children at genetic risk for neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions: interdisciplinary collaboration and research infrastructure.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Article
- Functional prediction of the potential NGLY1 mutations associated with rare disease CDG.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Consensus reporting guidelines to address gaps in descriptions of ultra-rare genetic conditions.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Comprehensive whole-genome sequence analyses provide insights into the genomic architecture of cerebral palsy.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Explicable prioritization of genetic variants by integration of rule-based and machine learning algorithms for diagnosis of rare Mendelian disorders.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Children with medical complexity (CMC) represent a growing population in the pediatric health care system, with high resource use and associated health care costs. A genetic diagnosis can inform prognosis, anticipatory care, management, and reproductive planning. Conventional genetic testing strategies for CMC are often costly, time consuming, and ultimately unsuccessful. Objective: To evaluate the analytical and clinical validity of genome sequencing as a comprehensive diagnostic genetic test for CMC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study of the prospective use of genome sequencing and comparison with standard-of-care genetic testing, CMC were recruited from May 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018, from a structured complex care program based at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. Recruited CMC had at least 1 chronic condition, technology dependence (child is dependent at least part of each day on mechanical ventilators, and/or child requires prolonged intravenous administration of nutritional substances or drugs, and/or child is expected to have prolonged dependence on other device-based support), multiple subspecialist involvement, and substantial health care use. Review of the care plans for 545 CMC identified 143 suspected of having an undiagnosed genetic condition. Fifty-four families met inclusion criteria and were interested in participating, and 49 completed the study. Probands, similarly affected siblings, and biological parents were eligible for genome sequencing. Exposures: Genome sequencing was performed using blood-derived DNA from probands and family members using established methods and a bioinformatics pipeline for clinical genome annotation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary study outcome was the diagnostic yield of genome sequencing (proportion of CMC for whom the test result yielded a new diagnosis). Results: Genome sequencing was performed for 138 individuals from 49 families of CMC (29 male and 20 female probands; mean [SD] age, 7.0 [4.5] years). Genome sequencing detected all genomic variation previously identified by conventional genetic testing. A total of 15 probands (30.6%; 95% CI 19.5%-44.6%) received a new primary molecular genetic diagnosis after genome sequencing. Three individuals had novel diseases and an additional 9 had either ultrarare genetic conditions or rare genetic conditions with atypical features. At least 11 families received diagnostic information that had clinical management implications beyond genetic and reproductive counseling. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that genome sequencing has high analytical and clinical validity and can result in new diagnoses in CMC even in the setting of extensive prior investigations. This clinical population may be enriched for ultrarare and novel genetic disorders. Genome sequencing is a potentially first-tier genetic test for CMC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.