Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960211›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental entomology2020

Within-Colony Transmission of Microsporidian and Trypanosomatid Parasites in Honey Bee and Bumble Bee Colonies.

Mario S Pinilla-Gallego, Emma E Williams, Abby Davis, Jacquelyn L Fitzgerald, Scott H McArt, Rebecca E Irwin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Investigations on Beekeeping and Breeding ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mario S Pinilla-GallegoDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Emma E WilliamsEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Abby DavisEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Jacquelyn L FitzgeraldDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Scott H McArtEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Rebecca E IrwinDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Cornell University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Transmission Networks in Trait-Based CommunitiesR01GM122062 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ADLER, LYNN S., ELLNER, STEPHEN PAUL · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites are commonly cited as one of the causes of population declines for both managed and wild bees. Epidemiological models sometimes assume that increasing the proportion of infected individuals in a group should increase transmission. However, social insects exhibit behaviors and traits which can dampen the link between parasite pressure and disease spread. Understanding patterns of parasite transmission within colonies of social bees has important implications for how to control diseases within those colonies, and potentially the broader pollinator community. We used bumble bees (Bombus impatiens Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and western honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) infected with the gut parasites Crithidia bombi (Lipa & Triggiani) (Trypanosomatida: Trypanosomatidae) and Nosema ceranae (Fries et al.) (Dissociodihaplophasida: Nosematidae), respectively, to understand how the initial proportion of infected individuals impacts within-colony spread and intensity of infection of the parasites. In bumble bees, we found that higher initial parasite prevalence increased both the final prevalence and intensity of infection of C. bombi. In honey bees, higher initial prevalence increased the intensity of infection in individual bees, but not the final prevalence of N. ceranae. Measures that reduce the probability of workers bringing parasites back to the nest may have implications for how to control transmission and/or severity of infection and disease outbreaks, which could also have important consequences for controlling disease spread back into the broader bee community.

Indexed as

ParasitesAnimalsBeesNosemaApis melliferaBombus impatiensCrithidia bombidiseaseNosema ceranae

Identifiers

PMID32960211
PMCPMC7734961
OpenAlexW3087577584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.