Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32960182›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2020

Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review.

Abrar Alturkistani, Ambar Qavi, Philip Emeka Anyanwu, Geva Greenfield, Felix Greaves, Ceire Costelloe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Outpatient Portal Use and Blood Pressure Management during Pregnancy.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abrar AlturkistaniGlobal Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-8870
Ambar QaviDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-1979
Philip Emeka AnyanwuGlobal Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-7062
Geva GreenfieldPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9779-2486
Felix GreavesGlobal Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9393-3122
Ceire CostelloeGlobal Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3475-7525

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2016-09-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portal use could help improve the care and health outcomes of patients with diabetes owing to functionalities, such as appointment booking, electronic messaging (e-messaging), and repeat prescription ordering, which enable patient-centered care and improve patient self-management of the disease.

objectiveThis review aimed to summarize the evidence regarding patient portal use (portals that are connected to electronic health care records) or patient portal functionality use (eg, appointment booking and e-messaging) and their reported associations with health and health care quality outcomes among adult patients with diabetes.

methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases and reported the review methodology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and two reviewers assessed the full texts of relevant studies and performed data extraction and quality assessments of the included studies. We used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tool to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data were summarized through narrative synthesis.

resultsTwelve studies were included in this review. Five studies reported overall patient portal use and its association with diabetes health and health care quality outcomes. Six studies reported e-messaging or email use-associated outcomes, and two studies reported prescription refill-associated outcomes. The reported health outcomes included the associations of patient portal use with blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and BMI. Few studies reported health care utilization outcomes such as office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. A limited number of studies reported overall quality of care for patients with diabetes who used patient portals.

conclusionsThe included studies mostly reported improved glycemic control outcomes for patients with diabetes who used patient portals. However, limitations of studying the effects of patient portals exist, which do not guarantee whether the outcomes reported are completely the result of patient portal use or if confounding factors exist. Randomized controlled trials and mixed-methods studies could help understand the mechanisms involved in health outcome improvements and patient portal use among patients with diabetes.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019141131; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019141131. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/14975.

Indexed as

HumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPatient PortalsQualitative Researchelectronic health recordsonline accesspatient portalpatient recordspersonal health recordsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32960182
PMCPMC7539164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.