Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959981›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2021

Ancient life and moving fluids.

Brandt M Gibson, David J Furbish, Imran A Rahman, Mark W Schmeeckle, Marc Laflamme, Simon A F Darroch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The rangeomorphiScience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brandt M GibsonDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351805, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235-1805, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-9620-0063
David J FurbishDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351805, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235-1805, U.S.A.
Imran A RahmanOxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, U.K.
Mark W SchmeeckleSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, U.S.A.
Marc LaflammeDepartment of Chemical and Physical Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3356 Mississauga Rd North, Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 1C6, Canada.
Simon A F DarrochDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351805, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235-1805, U.S.A.

Funding

National Geographic Society 9968-16National Science Foundation EAR-1735992Paleontological Society Arthur Boucot AwardVanderbilt University Alberstadt-Reesman-Stearns Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 3.7 billion years of Earth history, life has evolved complex adaptations to help navigate and interact with the fluid environment. Consequently, fluid dynamics has become a powerful tool for studying ancient fossils, providing insights into the palaeobiology and palaeoecology of extinct organisms from across the tree of life. In recent years, this approach has been extended to the Ediacara biota, an enigmatic assemblage of Neoproterozoic soft-bodied organisms that represent the first major radiation of macroscopic eukaryotes. Reconstructing the ways in which Ediacaran organisms interacted with the fluids provides new insights into how these organisms fed, moved, and interacted within communities. Here, we provide an in-depth review of fluid physics aimed at palaeobiologists, in which we dispel misconceptions related to the Reynolds number and associated flow conditions, and specify the governing equations of fluid dynamics. We then review recent advances in Ediacaran palaeobiology resulting from the application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We provide a worked example and account of best practice in CFD analyses of fossils, including the first large eddy simulation (LES) experiment performed on extinct organisms. Lastly, we identify key questions, barriers, and emerging techniques in fluid dynamics, which will not only allow us to understand the earliest animal ecosystems better, but will also help to develop new palaeobiological tools for studying ancient life.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemAnimalsBiotaComputer SimulationFossilscomputational fluid dynamicsEdiacara biotafluid dynamicslarge eddy simulationosmotrophysuspension feeding

Identifiers

PMID32959981
PMCPMC7821342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.