Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959926›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2020

Contrast sensitivity and binocular reading speed best correlating with near distance vision-related quality of life in bilateral nAMD.

Petra Rossouw, Maria M Guichard, Katja Hatz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Additional measures of macular function beyond visual acuity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of intravitreal injection therapy on contrast sensitivity in patients with nAMD and DME.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contrast sensitivity and binocular reading speed best correlating with near distance vision-related quality of life in bilateral nAMD.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petra RossouwDepartment of Vision Science and Optometry, University of Aalen, Aalen, Germany.
Maria M GuichardVista Klinik Binningen, Binningen, Switzerland.
Katja HatzVista Klinik Binningen, Binningen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2807-0310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) causes difficulties in daily life, especially with regard to near-vision tasks, despite well preserved Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at distance. Therefore, alternative visual function measures were evaluated in terms of their correlation with vision-related quality of life scores (QoL).

methodsA prospective cross-sectional pilot study including patients with a diagnosis of bilateral nAMD having lesions within the central 1 mm ETDRS grid subfield. Standardised testing included a vision-related QoL assessment (NEI-VFQ25), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), Radner maximum reading speed and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity (CS).

resultsN = 54. The mean better eye (range) BCVA was 79 (55-96) letters, median (range) LLVA 79.5 (58-97) letters and median (range) CS 1.35 (0-1.65) log units. Mean binocular maximum reading speed was 117.33 ± 28.42 wpm. The best correlations with the near subscale score were found for CS followed by binocular maximum reading speed (r = 0.59, p = 0.0001; r = 0.36, p = 0.008, respectively). A weaker correlation was observed for the BCVA in the better eye (r = 0.33, p = 0.02). The correlation between the NEI-VFQ25 distance subscale and BCVA was weaker (r = 0.37, p = 0.005) than the correlations with CS (r = 0.67, p = 0.0001) and LLVA (r = 0.40, p = 0.003).

conclusionsFor patients with a bilateral centre-involving nAMD, the best correlation with near QoL was the better eye CS followed by maximum binocular reading speed. These measures could be valuable in quantifying vision-related QoL outcomes in AMD clinical trials.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeReadingVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overContrast SensitivityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesVision, BinocularWet Macular Degenerationage related macular degenerationcontrast sensitivityETDRSNEI-VFQ25quality of lifereading speed

Identifiers

PMID32959926
PMCPMC7702040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.