Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959606›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and global health2020

Prevalence and Incidence of Low Back Pain in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.

Mai A Aldera, Caroline M Alexander, Alison H McGregor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06812338 (Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06812338 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsNon-specific Low Back Pain, Lumbar TractionArmsmechanical traction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mai A AlderaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, MSK Lab, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
Caroline M AlexanderDepartment of Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
Alison H McGregorFaculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, MSK Lab, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designA systematic review.

objectiveTo identify published studies that assess the prevalence and incidence of Low Back Pain (LBP) in the Saudi Arabian population.

methodsSix electronic databases were searched for articles published between January 1995 and December 2018. Crosssectional or cohort studies were included if they were conducted in the KSA and focused on the prevalence or incidence of LBP in adults. Case-control and retrospective studies were excluded. Studies were also excluded if they did not meet the quality criteria set out by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) assessment or had a high or medium risk of bias according to the criteria proposed by Hoy et al. One independent reviewer (MAA) verified that the studies met the inclusion criteria, and three independent reviewers (MAA, AHM, CMA) assessed the quality of the studies and extracted their relevant characteristics. All the studies were assessed for quality using the JBI assessment and were assessed for risk of bias according to the Hoy et al. approach.

resultsThe initial search identified 158 papers; five studies met the inclusion criteria. The nature of the findings meant no meta-analysis could be performed; therefore, a narrative summary was generated to discuss the findings. The prevalence of LBP in different professional groups within a working-age group ranged between 64% and 89%. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of LBP in the KSA has only been examined within specific professional groups, which limits the ability to generalize the finding. The review clarifies the need for further quality epidemiological studies to identify the prevalence of LBP in the general population. Many of the issues identified are problems related to occupational risk of LBP. The implication therefore is that these occupational factors need to be assessed so that risk factors for LBP among employees in KSA can be modified. KEY POINTS: . 1: The prevalence of LBP in the KSA has only been examined within specific professional groups. 2: The included studies link the prevalence of LBP to numbers of occupational-risk factors such as; participants' specialities, years of experience and working load. 3: The prevalence of LBP is more common in female employee. 4: This review outlines the need for further epidemiology studies of the general population in the KSA.

Indexed as

Low Back PainCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIncidencePrevalenceSaudi ArabiaKingdom of Saudi ArabiaLow back painprevalence and incidence

Identifiers

PMID32959606
PMCPMC7758856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.