ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2020
Prognosis of Split Liver Transplantation Compared with Whole Liver Transplantation in Adult Patients: Single-center Results under the Korean MELD Score-based Allocation Policy.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Donor Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Pediatric Split Liver Transplantation.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Optimizing pediatric liver transplantation allocation: a simulation study on new splittable deceased donor criteria in Korea.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Article
- Pediatric-adult split liver transplantation: an ethical imperative and systems-based roadmap for global expansion.Frontiers in transplantation · 2025Article
- Full-Right Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients: A Single-Center Experience in China.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of donor age on short-term outcomes after pediatric split liver transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Current Approaches in the Allocation of Liver Transplantation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Standard liver weight model in adult deceased donors with fatty liver: A prospective cohort study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Clinical sequence of an adult recipient undergone split liver transplantation using a right liver graft with erroneous deprivation of the middle hepatic vein trunk: a case report.Korean journal of transplantation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSplit liver transplantation (SLT) has been occasionally performed in Korea. This study compared the incidence and prognosis of SLT with whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adult patients.
methodsBetween June 2016 and November 2019, 242 adult patients underwent a total of 256 deceased donor liver transplantation operations. SLT was performed in 7 patients (2.9%).
resultsThe mean age of SLT donors was 29.7 ± 7.4 years, and the mean age of recipients was 55.7 ± 10.6 years, with the latter having a mean model for end-stage liver disease score of 34.6 ± 3.1. Mean split right liver graft weight was 1,228.6 ± 149.7 g and mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.97 ± 0.39. Of the seven SLT recipients, Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) status was one in status 1, one in status 2 and five in status 3. The graft (
conclusionSurvival outcomes were similar in adult SLT and WLT recipients, probably due to selection of high-quality grafts and low-risk recipients. Prudent selection of donors and adult recipients for SLT may expand the liver graft pool for pediatric patients without affecting outcomes in adults undergoing SLT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.