Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959344›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Volumetric spatial behaviour in rats reveals the anisotropic organisation of navigation.

Selim Jedidi-Ayoub, Karyna Mishchanchuk, Anyi Liu, Sophie Renaudineau, Éléonore Duvelle, Roddy M Grieves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Selim Jedidi-AyoubDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Behavioral Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-9960
Karyna MishchanchukDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Behavioral Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-790X
Anyi LiuDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Behavioral Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-8991
Sophie RenaudineauDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Behavioral Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Éléonore DuvelleDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Behavioral Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3514-8801
Roddy M GrievesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Behavioral Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. r.grieves@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-4056

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103896AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated how access to the vertical dimension influences the natural exploratory and foraging behaviour of rats. Using high-accuracy three-dimensional tracking of position in two- and three-dimensional environments, we sought to determine (i) how rats navigated through the environments with respect to gravity, (ii) where rats chose to form their home bases in volumetric space, and (iii) how they navigated to and from these home bases. To evaluate how horizontal biases may affect these behaviours, we compared a 3D maze where animals preferred to move horizontally to a different 3D configuration where all axes were equally energetically costly to traverse. Additionally, we compared home base formation in two-dimensional arenas with and without walls to the three-dimensional climbing mazes. We report that many behaviours exhibited by rats in horizontal spaces naturally extend to fully volumetric ones, such as home base formation and foraging excursions. We also provide further evidence for the strong differentiation of the horizontal and vertical axes: rats showed a horizontal movement bias, they formed home bases mainly in the bottom layers of both mazes and they generally solved the vertical component of return trajectories before and faster than the horizontal component. We explain the bias towards horizontal movements in terms of energy conservation, while the locations of home bases are explained from an information gathering view as a method for correcting self-localisation.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionSpatial BehaviorAnimalsBiasMovementRatsBehaviourForagingHome baseRatThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID32959344
PMCPMC7829245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.