Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959329›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Intragastric Balloon: a Retrospective Evaluation of 5874 Patients on Tolerance, Complications, and Efficacy in Different Degrees of Overweight.

Ricardo José Fittipaldi-Fernandez, Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho, Cristina Fajardo Diestel, Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein, Marcelo Falcão de Santana, João Henrique Felicio de Lima, Fernando Santos Silva Bastos, Newton Teixeira Dos Santos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Endoscopy for Metabolic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo José Fittipaldi-FernandezEndogastroRio Clinic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Idiberto José Zotarelli-FilhoFaculty of Medicine, FACERES, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. dr.idibertozotarelli@faceres.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1829
Cristina Fajardo DiestelDepartment of Applied Nutrition, Nutrition Institute, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Márcia Regina Simas Torres KleinDepartment of Applied Nutrition, Nutrition Institute, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Marcelo Falcão de SantanaIFEC-Instituto Falcão de Endoscopia e Cirurgia (Falcão Institute of Endoscopy and Surgery), Salvador, BA, Brazil.
João Henrique Felicio de LimaEndobatel-Digestive Endoscopy, Universidade Federal do Paraná-UFPR (Federal University of Paraná), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Fernando Santos Silva BastosIFEC-Instituto Falcão de Endoscopia e Cirurgia (Falcão Institute of Endoscopy and Surgery), Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Newton Teixeira Dos SantosNT Santos Serviços médicos (NT Santos-Medical Services), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRFaculdade Ceres · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic methods, especially the intragastric balloon (IGB), have been shown to be effective for the treatment of excess weight. This study aimed to assess the tolerance, complications, and efficacy of excess weight treatment with a non-adjustable IGB during 6 months.

methodsA total of 5874 patients treated with a liquid-filled IGB (600-700 mL) and followed up by a multidisciplinary team were evaluated. Participants presented an initial body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m

resultsThe incidence of complications was 7.32% (n = 430): 6.10% (n = 357) early IGB removal, 0.20% (n = 12) gas production inside the balloon, 0.54% (n = 32) leakage, 0.32% (n = 19) pregnancy, 0.07% (n = 4) gastric perforation, 0.05% (n = 3) upper digestive bleeding, 0.01% (n = 1) Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome due to excessive vomiting, and 0.02% each (n = 1) pancreatitis and esophagus perforation. The 5444 remaining patients (4081 women, 38 ± 38 years) presented a weight loss of 19.13 ± 8.86 kg and a BMI decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) (36.94 ± 5.67 vs. 30.08 ± 5.06 kg/m

conclusionEndoscopic IGB treatment for excess weight is an excellent therapeutic option for patients with different degrees of overweight.

Indexed as

Gastric BalloonObesity, MorbidBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleObesityRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric endoscopyEndoscopicIntragastric balloonObesity treatmentOrbera balloon

Identifiers

PMID32959329
OpenAlexW3087047174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.