Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959328›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2020

Integrating sustainable nutrition into health-related institutions: a systematic review of the literature.

Laurence Guillaumie, Olivier Boiral, Amel Baghdadli, Geneviève Mercille

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stop ringing the alarm; it is time to get out of the building!Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurence GuillaumieFaculty of Nursing, Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. Laurence.Guillaumie@fsi.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-8285
Olivier BoiralCanada Research Chair in Internalization of Sustainability Practices and Organizational Accountability, Department of Management, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Amel BaghdadliDepartment of Management, Université Laval, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, 2325 rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Geneviève MercilleDepartment of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Liliane de Stewart, 2405, chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSustainable nutrition is increasingly important, as the food system contributes one third of greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable nutrition, or sustainable diet, refers to diets with low environmental impacts that contribute to food security and health. This systematic review aimed to identify factors that influence whether professionals in health-related institutions integrate sustainable nutrition into their practice.

methodsA mixed-methods systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. To be included, the studies had to document perspectives on sustainable nutrition from health professionals, including dietitians, students and educators in health sciences, public health officers, and hospital food service managers. Data extraction focused on perceived barriers, facilitating factors, and top recommendations for promoting sustainable nutrition. SYNTHESIS: Twenty studies were included, most of which focused on dietitians. Data analysis revealed that 25 factors influenced the integration of sustainable nutrition into professional practice. The factors most reported in the included studies were perceived knowledge of sustainable nutrition, self-efficacy, awareness of environmental issues, and perceiving the promotion of sustainable nutrition to be part of one's professional role. Increasing societal support through awareness campaigns and increasing institutional support through guidelines, information tools, and financial support were also frequently mentioned.

conclusionSustainable nutrition is a multifaceted concept; integrating it into already complex professional practices is therefore challenging. At the present time, dietitians seem to be the health professionals predominantly researched regarding their views on sustainable nutrition. Many concrete avenues to promote sustainable nutrition were identified through this review.

Indexed as

Health Facility AdministrationNutritional StatusHumansClimate changeDietitiansFood supply managersGreenhouse gas emissionsHealth care facilitiesPublic healthSustainable nutritionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32959328
PMCPMC7728986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.