ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
UroVysion
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Urine Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Diagnosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic status and new explorations in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- New Perspectives on the Role of Liquid Biopsy in Bladder Cancer: Applicability to Precision Medicine.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UCUUT) is common. One of the mechanisms driving this is the implantation of cancer cells from the UCUUT at the RNUs. Therefore, their detection after RNU can assist in predicting IVR. This study aimed to examine the utility of UroVysion
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 65 patients who received RNU for high-grade UCUUT between October 2013 and April 2017.
resultsOf the 65 patients, 54 (83.1%) who had both bladder urine samples available immediately after RNU (0 postoperative days: POD) and 5 days after RNU (5POD) were selected. We performed UroVysion
conclusionMultiple urine tests using UroVysion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.