Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32959094›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Can the degree of coronary collateralization be used in clinical routine as a valid angiographic parameter of viability?

Maja Pirnat, Arthur E Stillman, Rainer Rienmueller, Marko Noc, Mario Gorenjak, Tomaž Šeruga

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maja PirnatRadiology Department, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia. majapirnat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7878-2837
Arthur E StillmanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Cardiothoracic Imaging, Emory Universitiy School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Rainer RienmuellerMedical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Marko NocCenter for Intensive Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mario GorenjakCentre for Human Molecular Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Tomaž ŠerugaRadiology Department, University Clinical Center, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success rate of percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions have increased in the recent years. However, improvement of function is only possible when significant myocardial viability is present. One of the most important factors of maintaining myocardial viability is the opening and development of collaterals. Our hypothesis was that with a higher degree of collaterals more viable myocardium is present. In 38 patients we compared the degree of collaterals, evaluated with a conventional coronary angiogram (CCA) and graded by the Rentrop classification to transmural extent of the scar obtained in a viability study with magnetic resonance (MRI). We found a statistically significant association of the degree of collaterals determined with Rentrop method and transmural extent of the scar as measured by CMR (p = 0.001; Tau = -0.144). Additionally, associations showed an increase in the ratio between viable vs. non-viable myocardium with the degree of collaterals. Our study suggests that it may be beneficial to routinely grade the collaterals at angiography in patients with CTO as an assessment of myocardial viability.

Indexed as

Collateral CirculationCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAgedChronic DiseaseCoronary OcclusionCoronary VesselsFemaleFibrosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsCCACMRCollateral gradeMyocardial viabilityRentrop methodViability parameters

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.