Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958924›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2020

Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research.

Cyril Pernet, Marta I Garrido, Alexandre Gramfort, Natasha Maurits, Christoph M Michel, Elizabeth Pang, Riitta Salmelin, Jan Mathijs Schoffelen, Pedro A Valdes-Sosa, Aina Puce

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Electroencephalography, Magnetoencephalography, and Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Heartbeat-evoked neural response abnormalities in generalized anxiety disorder during peripheral adrenergic stimulation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cyril PernetCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. cyril.pernet@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4010-4632
Marta I GarridoMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Alexandre GramfortUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-4404
Natasha MauritsUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christoph M MichelDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elizabeth PangSickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Riitta SalmelinDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Jan Mathijs SchoffelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-6610
Pedro A Valdes-SosaJoint China-Cuba Laboratory for Neurotechnology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Aina PuceDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States. ainapuce@indiana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-4185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) has been active in advocating for the instantiation of best practices in neuroimaging data acquisition, analysis, reporting and sharing of both data and analysis code to deal with issues in science related to reproducibility and replicability. Here we summarize recommendations for such practices in magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) research, recently developed by the OHBM neuroimaging community known by the abbreviated name of COBIDAS MEEG. We discuss the rationale for the guidelines and their general content, which encompass many topics under active discussion in the field. We highlight future opportunities and challenges to maximizing the sharing and exploitation of MEG and EEG data, and we also discuss how this 'living' set of guidelines will evolve to continually address new developments in neurophysiological assessment methods and multimodal integration of neurophysiological data with other data types.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetoencephalography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.