ArticleEye (London, England)2021
Predictors and ocular outcomes of rescue treatment in preterm infants with treated retinopathy of prematurity-a retrospective study.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine predictors of rescue treatment among infants treated for retinopathy of prematurity and to evaluate their ocular outcomes at 18-24 months of corrected age.
methodsThis is a single centre retrospective study of infants who received treatment for type 1 ROP, using laser photocoagulation or anti VEGF agents. Multivariable logistic regression was used to generate a prediction model for rescue treatment of ROP. The primary outcome was an abnormal refractive outcome by 24 months of corrected age, among infants primarily treated with laser therapy.
resultsTwo hundred and eight infants (including 416 eyes) who received single (n = 151) or rescue (multiple) treatments (n = 57) were included. Ninety three percent of the infants were primarily treated with laser photocoagulation. Lower gestational age, small for gestational age, early packed red blood cell transfusion (within 2 weeks of postnatal age), and presence of Zone 1 retinopathy predicted the need for rescue treatment in treated infants [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.81 (0.73-0.89)]. The incidence of abnormal refractive outcome, assessed in a total of 174 infants, was found to be significantly higher in the rescue treatment group (67% versus 21%, adjusted odds ratio: 7.56 (3.3-17.2), P < 0.001). Myopia, very high myopia and use of spectacles was significantly higher in the rescue treatment group (P < 0.001 for each).
conclusionsRescue treatment for ROP was associated with an increased incidence of refractive errors and requirement of spectacles by 2 years of age. Larger prospective multicentre studies are required to confirm the findings from our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.