Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958831›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Key histopathologic features in idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension: an interobserver agreement study and proposal for diagnostic criteria.

Jiancong Liang, Chanjuan Shi, William D Dupont, Safia N Salaria, Won Jae Huh, Hernan Correa, Joseph T Roland, Roman E Perri, Mary Kay Washington

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiancong LiangDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. jiancong.liang@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-4346
Chanjuan ShiDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
William D DupontDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Safia N SalariaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Won Jae HuhDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hernan CorreaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joseph T RolandEpithelial Biology Center and Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and the Nashville VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Roman E PerriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mary Kay WashingtonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. kay.washington@vumc.org.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USDuke Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histologic features of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH), loosely termed as obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), are heterogenous, often subtle, and overlap with other entities. To this date, no consensus histopathologic diagnostic criteria have been established for INCPH. For these reasons, rendering a reproducible consensus histologic diagnosis of OPV on a liver biopsy may often be challenging even for experienced hepatopathologists. We report herein a two-phase interobserver agreement study on the diagnosis of OPV and assessed the relative value of histologic features in 104 liver biopsies in distinguishing between INCPH and non-INCPH with the goal to obtain a consensus on specific practical diagnostic criteria. Six hepatopathologists blinded to clinical information and original pathologic diagnosis reviewed internet-based case study sets with high-resolution whole-slide images. The initial interobserver agreement on OPV was expectedly low, but significantly improved (moderate agreement in most categories) upon adopting a consensus view recognizing portal vein sclerosis as the only strong independent histologic predictor for INCPH, and that contrary to the conventional view, aberrant portal/periportal vessels does not significantly contribute to the positive assignment of OPV status. We propose a three-tiered classification with diagnostic criteria to facilitate the histologic assignment of OPV status for the evaluation of INCPH. Furthermore, we have validated the performance of the proposed criteria either based on histology alone or coupled with clinicopathologic correlation. This classification may aid in practical histologic assessment of liver biopsies with or without portal hypertension and help to improve diagnostic consistency and accuracy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyCase-Control StudiesChildDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansHypertension, PortalLiverMaleMiddle AgedObserver Variation

Identifiers

PMID32958831
OpenAlexW3087085601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.