Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958765›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Visual mate preference evolution during butterfly speciation is linked to neural processing genes.

Matteo Rossi, Alexander E Hausmann, Timothy J Thurman, Stephen H Montgomery, Riccardo Papa, Chris D Jiggins, W Owen McMillan, Richard M Merrill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ASPEN: Robust detection of allelic dynamics in single cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Genetics and the Evolution of Prezygotic Isolation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Matteo RossiDivision of Evolutionary Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany. rossi@bio.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-3355
Alexander E HausmannDivision of Evolutionary Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-6290
Timothy J ThurmanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-6226
Stephen H MontgomerySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Riccardo PapaSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7986-9993
Chris D JigginsSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7809-062X
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.
Richard M MerrillDivision of Evolutionary Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany. merrill@bio.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4527-9298
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PALudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY & EDUCATION CORE (STCE)P20GM103475 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI Jose R. Rodriguez-Medina · 2012 to 2026
$52.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animal species remain separate not because their individuals fail to produce viable hybrids but because they "choose" not to mate. However, we still know very little of the genetic mechanisms underlying changes in these mate preference behaviours. Heliconius butterflies display bright warning patterns, which they also use to recognize conspecifics. Here, we couple QTL for divergence in visual preference behaviours with population genomic and gene expression analyses of neural tissue (central brain, optic lobes and ommatidia) across development in two sympatric Heliconius species. Within a region containing 200 genes, we identify five genes that are strongly associated with divergent visual preferences. Three of these have previously been implicated in key components of neural signalling (specifically an ionotropic glutamate receptor and two regucalcins), and overall our candidates suggest shifts in behaviour involve changes in visual integration or processing. This would allow preference evolution without altering perception of the wider environment.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectGenetic SpeciationMating Preference, AnimalAnimalsButterfliesFemaleGene Expression RegulationGene FlowGenome, InsectMaleMutationQuantitative Trait LociSpecies SpecificitySympatryVisual PerceptionWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID32958765
PMCPMC7506007
OpenAlexW3087533729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.