Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958737›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Urachal Carcinoma: Are Lymphadenectomy and Umbilectomy Necessary?

Zhuo Jia, Xiao Chang, Xing Li, Baojun Wang, Xu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Urachal Carcinomas: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhuo JiaDepartment of Urology/State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital/PLA Medical School, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xiao ChangDepartment of Urology/State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital/PLA Medical School, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xing LiDepartment of Urology/State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital/PLA Medical School, Beijing, China (mainland).
Baojun WangDepartment of Urology/State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital/PLA Medical School, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xu ZhangDepartment of Urology/State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital/PLA Medical School, Beijing, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to explore the impact of lymphadenectomy and umbilectomy on long-term survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with urachal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 39 patients with urachal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic outcomes were evaluated, and overall survival (OS) and PFS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Thirty-four (87.2%) patients underwent partial cystectomy, and 3 (7.7%) patients underwent radical cystectomy with en bloc urachal resection. Eighteen (46.2%) patients underwent lymphadenectomy and 27 (69.2%) patients had umbilectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size (P=0.011), Mayo stage (P=0.012), and umbilectomy (P=0.007) were the independent prognostic factors for OS. The median overall survival time was 67 months. The differentiation degree of tumor (P=0.049), Mayo stage (P=0.004), and umbilectomy (P=0.046) were the independent prognostic factors for PFS. Lymph node resection was not a predictor of OS. Patients had poorer prognosis when the tumor invaded the entire wall, including the mucous layer, muscular layer, and serous layer of the bladder compared with those that invaded only the muscular layer (P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS Lymph node metastases and failure to undergo umbilectomy were the independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Lymph node resection was not a predictor of OS. Patients had poorer prognosis when the tumor invaded the entire wall of the bladder compared with those that invaded the muscular layer.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessRisk FactorsSurvival RateUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32958737
PMCPMC7519942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.