Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958556›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2020

Accuracy of telephone triage in primary care patients with chest discomfort: a cross-sectional study.

Loes Tcm Wouters, Frans H Rutten, Daphne Ca Erkelens, Esther De Groot, Roger Amj Damoiseaux, Dorien Lm Zwart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Clinical decision rules in the pre-hospital triage of patients with chest pain.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2023
    Article
  9. Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Loes Tcm WoutersGeneral Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands L.T.C.Wouters-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1525-9803
Frans H RuttenGeneral Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daphne Ca ErkelensGeneral Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esther De GrootGeneral Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roger Amj DamoiseauxGeneral Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dorien Lm ZwartGeneral Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of semi-automatic assisted telephone triage in patients with acute chest discomfort against the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or other life-threatening events (LTEs).

methodsA cross-sectional study was performed of telephone conversations with 2023 patients with acute chest discomfort (pain, pressure, tightness or discomfort) who called out-of-hours services for primary care (OHS-PC) between 2014 and 2016. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values were calculated for a high urgency (patient seen within one hour) against the diagnoses of ACS and other LTEs. Diagnoses were retrieved from the patients' medical records in general practice, including hospital specialists' discharge letters.

resultsOf 2023 patients who called because of chest discomfort, 227 (11.2%) had an ACS (men 14.9%, women 8.2%) and 58 (2.9%) had another LTE (men 3.6%, women 2.3%). The sensitivity and specificity of a high Netherlands Triage System (NTS) urgency allocation against ACS/other LTEs were 0.73 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.78) and 0.43 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.45), respectively. In 13.2% of the calls the triage nurse overruled the NTS urgency, mostly by upscaling (11.0%). The sensitivity and specificity of the final urgency allocation were 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.90) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.37). The positive and negative predictive values of the final urgency were 0.18 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.19) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.95), respectively.

conclusionsThe semi-automatic triage NTS tool underestimated the urgency in 27% of patients with ACS/other LTEs. Overruling by triage nurses improved safety, but still 14% of men and women with ACS/other LTEs received too low urgency, while efficiency remained poor. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR7331.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTelephoneTriageAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Testsacute coronary syndromeemergency medicinegeneral practiceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32958556
PMCPMC7507892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.