SynthesisEnvironment international2020
Hazards of diethyl phthalate (DEP) exposure: A systematic review of animal toxicology studies.
Synthesis in Environment international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diethyl Phthalate (DEP) as a potential osteosarcoma risk factor: a multi-omics study integrating network Toxicology, single-cell RNA sequencing, and molecular docking.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Dose-Related Gastric Toxicity of Diethyl Phthalate in Female Wistar Rats.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Exploring the impact of DEP on pediatric Crohn's disease using machine learning and molecular docking methods.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Unraveling diethyl phthalate-induced prostate carcinogenesis: core targets revealed by integrated network toxicology, machine learning, and structural validation.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Phthalates, Bisphenol A, and Microbiological Investigations in Deep-Sea ShrimpFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unveiling the effects of micro and nano plastics in embryonic development.Toxicology reports · 2025Review
- Prediction of reproductive and developmental toxicity using an attention and gate augmented graph convolutional network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nontargeted Urinary Profiling Strategy for Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Women with Ovarian Malignancies.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Phthalate-Induced Hepatic Injury and Amelioration by Plant-Based Principles.Toxics · 2025Review
- Comparing phthalate exposure between bottlenose dolphins (Frontiers in Marine Science · 2025Article
- Diethyl phthalate and dibutyl phthalate disrupt sirtuins expression in the HepG2 cells.Toxicology research · 2024Article
- Article
- A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of diethyl phthalates in humans.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2024Article
- A Novel and Efficient Phthalate Hydrolase fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Associations between lifestyle factors and levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), phthalates and parabens in follicular fluid in women undergoing fertility treatment.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023Article
- Early-Life Exposure to a Mixture of Phenols and Phthalates in Relation to Child Social Behavior: Applying an Evidence-Based Prioritization to a Cohort with Improved Exposure Assessment.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Review
- Biodegradation of diethyl phthalate and phthalic acid by a new indigenous Pseudomonas putida.Folia microbiologica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiethyl phthalate (DEP) is widely used in many commercially available products including plastics and personal care products. DEP has generally not been found to share the antiandrogenic mode of action that is common among other types of phthalates, but there is emerging evidence that DEP may be associated with other types of health effects.
objectiveTo inform chemical risk assessment, we performed a systematic review to identify and characterize outcomes within six broad hazard categories (male reproductive, female reproductive, developmental, liver, kidney, and cancer) following exposure of nonhuman mammalian animals to DEP or its primary metabolite, monoethyl phthalate (MEP).
methodsA literature search was conducted in online scientific databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Toxline, Toxcenter) and Toxic Substances Control Act Submissions, augmented by review of online regulatory sources as well as forward and backward searches. Studies were selected for inclusion using PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcome) criteria. Studies were evaluated using criteria defined a priori for reporting quality, risk of bias, and sensitivity using a domain-based approach. Evidence was synthesized by outcome and life stage of exposure, and strength of evidence was summarized into categories of robust, moderate, slight, indeterminate, or compelling evidence of no effect, using a structured framework.
resultsThirty-four experimental studies in animals were included in this analysis. Although no effects on androgen-dependent male reproductive development were observed following gestational exposure to DEP, there was evidence including effects on sperm following peripubertal and adult exposures, and the overall evidence for male reproductive effects was considered moderate. There was moderate evidence that DEP exposure can lead to developmental effects, with the major effect being reduced postnatal growth following gestational or early postnatal exposure; this generally occurred at doses associated with maternal effects, consistent with the observation that DEP is not a potent developmental toxicant. The evidence for liver effects was considered moderate based on consistent changes in relative liver weight at higher dose levels; histopathological and biochemical changes indicative of hepatic effects were also observed, but primarily in studies that had significant concerns for risk of bias and sensitivity. The evidence for female reproductive effects was considered slight based on few reports of statistically significant effects on maternal body weight gain, organ weight changes, and pregnancy outcomes. Evidence for cancer and effects on kidney were judged to be indeterminate based on limited evidence (i.e., a single two-year cancer bioassay) and inconsistent findings, respectively.
conclusionsThese results suggest that DEP exposure may induce androgen-independent male reproductive toxicity (i.e., sperm effects) as well as developmental toxicity and hepatic effects, with some evidence of female reproductive toxicity. More research is warranted to fully evaluate these outcomes and strengthen confidence in this database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.