Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958045›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Lived experience research as a resource for recovery: a mixed methods study.

Anne Honey, Katherine M Boydell, Francesca Coniglio, Trang Thuy Do, Leonie Dunn, Katherine Gill, Helen Glover, Monique Hines, Justin Newton Scanlan, Barbara Tooth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Educating during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Educator Perspective on Mental Health.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the lived experience of receiving mental health crisis care at emergency departments, crisis phone lines and crisis care alternatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne HoneySchool of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. anne.honey@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-0454
Katherine M BoydellBlack Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Francesca ConiglioMental Health Drug & Alcohol, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Trang Thuy DoSchool of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Leonie DunnSt George and Sutherland Mental Health Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Katherine GillConsumer-Led Research Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Helen GloverEnlightened Consultants, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Monique HinesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Justin Newton ScanlanSchool of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Barbara ToothUpfront Leadership, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLived experience research is conducted by people who have experience of mental health issues and is therefore better placed than more traditional research to illuminate participants' experiences. Findings that focus on identifying enablers of recovery from a lived experience perspective have the potential to assist people in their recovery process. However, this lived experience research is often difficult to find, access and interpret. We co-produced user-friendly and engaging resources to disseminate findings from six lived experience research studies. This paper seeks to answer the research questions: a) Did exposure to lived experience research increase hopefulness for participants?; and b) How else did interacting with lived experience research resources influence participants' lives?

methodsThirty-eight participants were introduced to four resources of their choosing by peer workers over a four-week period. The helpfulness of resources was evaluated using mixed methods, including a quasi-experimental analysis of change in hope, an anonymous survey and in-depth interviews.

resultsFindings indicated that the resources promoted hope, but that increases in hopefulness may not be seen immediately. Other impacts include that the resources: encouraged helpful activities; provided a positive experience; increased valued knowledge; encouraged people to reflect on their journey and think constructively about mental health issues; helped people to feel less alone; and assisted people to explain their situation to others.

conclusionsThe research suggests the potential usefulness of lived experience research resources, presented in user-friendly formats, in the lives of people who experience mental health issues and implies a need to nurture this type of research.

Indexed as

HopePeer GroupHealth ResourcesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHopeKnowledge translationLived experience researchMental health recoveryService user research

Identifiers

PMID32958045
PMCPMC7507671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.