Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32958039›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2020

De-identifying free text of Japanese electronic health records.

Kohei Kajiyama, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Takashi Okumura, Mizuki Morita, Yoshinobu Kano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kohei KajiyamaFaculty of Informatics, Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 432-8011, Japan.
Hiromasa HoriguchiNational Hospital Organization Headquaters, 2-5-21 Higashigaoka, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8621, Japan.
Takashi OkumuraNational University Corporation Kitami Institute of Technology, 165, Koencho, Kitami, Hokkaido, 090-8507, Japan.
Mizuki MoritaGraduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, 2-5-1, Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Yoshinobu KanoFaculty of Informatics, Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 432-8011, Japan. kano@inf.shizuoka.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7864-842X
Shizuoka University · JPKitami Institute of Technology · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, more electronic data sources are becoming available in the healthcare domain. Electronic health records (EHRs), with their vast amounts of potentially available data, can greatly improve healthcare. Although EHR de-identification is necessary to protect personal information, automatic de-identification of Japanese language EHRs has not been studied sufficiently. This study was conducted to raise de-identification performance for Japanese EHRs through classic machine learning, deep learning, and rule-based methods, depending on the dataset.

resultsUsing three datasets, we implemented de-identification systems for Japanese EHRs and compared the de-identification performances found for rule-based, Conditional Random Fields (CRF), and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM)-based methods. Gold standard tags for de-identification are annotated manually for age, hospital, person, sex, and time. We used different combinations of our datasets to train and evaluate our three methods. Our best F1-scores were 84.23, 68.19, and 81.67 points, respectively, for evaluations of the MedNLP dataset, a dummy EHR dataset that was virtually written by a medical doctor, and a Pathology Report dataset. Our LSTM-based method was the best performing, except for the MedNLP dataset. The rule-based method was best for the MedNLP dataset. The LSTM-based method achieved a good score of 83.07 points for this MedNLP dataset, which differs by 1.16 points from the best score obtained using the rule-based method. Results suggest that LSTM adapted well to different characteristics of our datasets. Our LSTM-based method performed better than our CRF-based method, yielding a 7.41 point F1-score, when applied to our Pathology Report dataset. This report is the first of study applying this LSTM-based method to any de-identification task of a Japanese EHR.

conclusionsOur LSTM-based machine learning method was able to extract named entities to be de-identified with better performance, in general, than that of our rule-based methods. However, machine learning methods are inadequate for processing expressions with low occurrence. Our future work will specifically examine the combination of LSTM and rule-based methods to achieve better performance. Our currently achieved level of performance is sufficiently higher than that of publicly available Japanese de-identification tools. Therefore, our system will be applied to actual de-identification tasks in hospitals.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsLanguageNatural Language ProcessingDeep LearningDe-identificationElectronic health recordsJapanese language

Identifiers

PMID32958039
PMCPMC7504663
OpenAlexW3087011118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.