Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957972›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Differences in clerkship development between public and private Brazilian medical schools: an overview.

Mauricio Braz Zanolli, Derly Silva Streit, Dione Tavares Maciel, Evelin Massae Ogata Muraguchi, Milton Arruda Martins, Iolanda Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mauricio Braz ZanolliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Marilia Medical School, Rua Comandante Romão Gomes, 33, Marilia, SP, CEP: 17515-280, Brazil. mbzanolli@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5399-9407
Derly Silva StreitPetropolis Medical School, Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
Dione Tavares MacielPernambuco State University Medical School, Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil.
Evelin Massae Ogata MuraguchiLondrina State University Medical School, Londrina, Parana State, Brazil.
Milton Arruda MartinsMedicine School of São Paulo State University, São Paulo, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Iolanda Fátima Lopes Calvo TibérioMedicine School of São Paulo State University, São Paulo, São Paulo State, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround the world, it is very expensive to become a physician. Although public medical schools are less expensive than private medical schools, tuition fees are charged at public medical schools in the majority of countries. In Brazil, public medical schools, with the exception of municipal schools, are free. There has been little investigation of any differences in conditions offered by paid or free medical schools or what occurs in public and private clerkships in Brazil. We investigated the clerkship conditions offered to the students in both public and private Brazilian medical schools by gathering the opinions of clerkship coordinators and others responsible for clerkships.

methodsA cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical study using an electronic questionnaire was answered by clerkship coordinators to compare the clerkships of 30 public and 38 private Brazilian medical schools from all regions of the country. The questionnaires covered various aspects of the clinical environments, student supervision, faculty development, student assessments, rotation evaluations and extracurricular activities developed by students.

resultsWe observed significant differences between public and private medical schools in several aspects investigated. Based on the opinions of the clerkship coordinators, with the exception of access to university hospitals, which was predominantly offered by public medical schools, private medical schools offer better clerkship conditions. The main differences were related to the number of positions, infrastructure, clinical learning environments, faculty development, student assessments, rotation evaluations and students' extracurricular activities.

conclusionThis is the first study comparing Brazilian medical clerkships in private and public medical schools and provides a general vision of these programmes. It is necessary to further investigate clerkship development in the Brazilian medical school system and to study the differences between private and public medical schools globally.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipStudents, MedicalBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSchools, MedicalBrazilian medical schoolsCurriculumEducational measurementEducation, medicalInfrastructureInstitutional evaluationInternship and residencyPrivate medical schoolsPublic medical schoolsSchools, medical

Identifiers

PMID32957972
PMCPMC7504842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.