ArticleBMC medical education2020
Differences in clerkship development between public and private Brazilian medical schools: an overview.
Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncogenetics training in Brazilian medical genetics residency programs: current landscape and challenges.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Supervised machine learning models for predicting student mathematics performance in Somaliland primary examinations 2023.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Two decades of accreditation in Chilean medical education: outcomes and lessons learned.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Association between non-academic activities and professional identity formation of Indonesian medical students: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Development of Glutathione Hydrogel Carriers Containing Zinc Oxide Microparticles for Skin Regeneration Processes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Reflections on the Inclusion of Direct-Care Physicians as Educators in Community Hospitals.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2025Article
- Reliability across content areas in progress tests assessing medical knowledge: a Brazilian cross-sectional study with implications for medical education assessments.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2024Observational
- Effects of individual and organizational factors on job tenure of primary care physicians: A multilevel analysis from Brazil.PloS one · 2023Observational
- Perception of newly graduated physicians toward ethical education in medical schools: a Brazilian cross-sectional nationwide study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Article
- Shaping Tomorrow's Doctors: The Impact of Socioeconomic and Institutional Factors on Medical Education Quality in Brazil: An Ecological Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAround the world, it is very expensive to become a physician. Although public medical schools are less expensive than private medical schools, tuition fees are charged at public medical schools in the majority of countries. In Brazil, public medical schools, with the exception of municipal schools, are free. There has been little investigation of any differences in conditions offered by paid or free medical schools or what occurs in public and private clerkships in Brazil. We investigated the clerkship conditions offered to the students in both public and private Brazilian medical schools by gathering the opinions of clerkship coordinators and others responsible for clerkships.
methodsA cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical study using an electronic questionnaire was answered by clerkship coordinators to compare the clerkships of 30 public and 38 private Brazilian medical schools from all regions of the country. The questionnaires covered various aspects of the clinical environments, student supervision, faculty development, student assessments, rotation evaluations and extracurricular activities developed by students.
resultsWe observed significant differences between public and private medical schools in several aspects investigated. Based on the opinions of the clerkship coordinators, with the exception of access to university hospitals, which was predominantly offered by public medical schools, private medical schools offer better clerkship conditions. The main differences were related to the number of positions, infrastructure, clinical learning environments, faculty development, student assessments, rotation evaluations and students' extracurricular activities.
conclusionThis is the first study comparing Brazilian medical clerkships in private and public medical schools and provides a general vision of these programmes. It is necessary to further investigate clerkship development in the Brazilian medical school system and to study the differences between private and public medical schools globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.