Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957952›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Co-construction of the family-focused support conversation: a participatory learning and action research study to implement support for family members whose relatives are being discharged for end-of-life care at home or in a nursing home.

Sue Duke, Natasha Campling, Carl R May, Susi Lund, Neil Lunt, Hospital to Home Co-researcher group, Alison Richardson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sue DukeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England. sd11@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-8086
Natasha CamplingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England.
Carl R MayFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, England.
Susi LundSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England.
Neil LuntDepartment of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, England.
Hospital to Home Co-researcher group
Alison RichardsonUniversity Hospitals Southampton and School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England.
University of Southampton · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

School for Social Care Research CO88/T14-035/USSD-P63
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people move in and out of hospital in the last few weeks of life. These care transitions can be distressing for family members because they signify the deterioration and impending death of their ill relative and forthcoming family bereavement. Whilst there is evidence about psychosocial support for family members providing end-of-life care at home, there is limited evidence about how this can be provided in acute hospitals during care transitions. Consequently, family members report a lack of support from hospital-based healthcare professionals.

methodsThe aim of the study was to implement research evidence for family support at the end-of-life in acute hospital care. Informed by Participatory Learning and Action Research and Normalization Process Theory (NPT) we co-designed a context-specific intervention, the Family-Focused Support Conversation, from a detailed review of research evidence. We undertook a pilot implementation in three acute hospital Trusts in England to assess the potential for the intervention to be used in clinical practice. Pilot implementation was undertaken during a three-month period by seven clinical co-researchers - nurses and occupational therapists in hospital specialist palliative care services. Implementation was evaluated through data comprised of reflective records of intervention delivery (n = 22), in-depth records of telephone implementation support meetings between research team members and co-researchers (n = 3), and in-depth evaluation meetings (n = 2). Data were qualitatively analysed using an NPT framework designed for intervention evaluation.

resultsClinical co-researchers readily incorporated the Family-Focused Support Conversation into their everyday work. The intervention changed family support from being solely patient-focused, providing information about patient needs, to family-focused, identifying family concerns about the significance and implications of discharge and facilitating family-focused care. Co-researchers reported an increase in family members' involvement in discharge decisions and end-of-life care planning.

conclusionThe Family-Focused Support Conversation is a novel, evidenced-based and context specific intervention. Pilot implementation demonstrated the potential for the intervention to be used in acute hospitals to support family members during end-of-life care transitions. This subsequently informed a larger scale implementation study.

trial registrationn/a.

Indexed as

Social SupportCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEnglandFamilyHumansPatient DischargeQualitative ResearchTerminal CareAcute hospitalsEnd-of-life careFamily-Focused Support ConversationFamily Sense of CoherenceFamily supportImplementationNormalization Process TheoryParticipatory Learning and Action Research

Identifiers

PMID32957952
PMCPMC7507823
OpenAlexW3087164071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.