ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Keeping up with the genomes: efficient learning of our increasing knowledge of the tree of life.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning and statistical inference in microbial population genomics.Genome biology · 2025Review
- ganon2: up-to-date and scalable metagenomics analysis.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- The Naïve Bayes classifier++ for metagenomic taxonomic classification-query evaluation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- MNBC: a multithreaded Minimizer-based Naïve Bayes Classifier for improved metagenomic sequence classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- YACHT: an ANI-based statistical test to detect microbial presence/absence in a metagenomic sample.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Improving taxonomic classification with feature space balancing.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Article
- Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is a computational challenge for current metagenomic classifiers to keep up with the pace of training data generated from genome sequencing projects, such as the exponentially-growing NCBI RefSeq bacterial genome database. When new reference sequences are added to training data, statically trained classifiers must be rerun on all data, resulting in a highly inefficient process. The rich literature of "incremental learning" addresses the need to update an existing classifier to accommodate new data without sacrificing much accuracy compared to retraining the classifier with all data.
resultsWe demonstrate how classification improves over time by incrementally training a classifier on progressive RefSeq snapshots and testing it on: (a) all known current genomes (as a ground truth set) and (b) a real experimental metagenomic gut sample. We demonstrate that as a classifier model's knowledge of genomes grows, classification accuracy increases. The proof-of-concept naïve Bayes implementation, when updated yearly, now runs in 1/4
conclusionsIt is evident that classification improves by having the most current knowledge at its disposal. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to make classifiers computationally tractable to keep up with the data deluge. The incremental learning classifier can be efficiently updated without the cost of reprocessing nor the access to the existing database and therefore save storage as well as computation resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.