Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957691›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Complete Remission of Mouse Melanoma after Temporally Fractionated Microbeam Radiotherapy.

Cristian Fernandez-Palomo, Verdiana Trappetti, Marine Potez, Paolo Pellicioli, Michael Krisch, Jean Laissue, Valentin Djonov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristian Fernandez-PalomoInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-262X
Verdiana TrappettiInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-833X
Marine PotezInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Paolo PellicioliBiomedical Beamline ID17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38043 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-116X
Michael KrischBiomedical Beamline ID17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38043 Grenoble, France.
Jean LaissueInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Valentin DjonovInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FR

Funding

Bernische Krebsliga 190Krebsforschung Schweiz KFS-4281-08-2017Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_176038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynchrotron Microbeam Radiotherapy (MRT) significantly improves local tumour control with minimal normal tissue toxicity. MRT delivers orthovoltage X-rays at an ultra-high "FLASH" dose rate in spatially fractionated beams, typically only few tens of micrometres wide. One of the biggest challenges in translating MRT to the clinic is its use of high peak doses, of around 300-600 Gy, which can currently only be delivered by synchrotron facilities. Therefore, in an effort to improve the translation of MRT to the clinic, this work studied whether the temporal fractionation of traditional MRT into several sessions with lower, more clinically feasible, peak doses could still maintain local tumour control.

methodsTwo groups of twelve C57Bl/6J female mice harbouring B16-F10 melanomas in their ears were treated with microbeams of 50 µm in width spaced by 200 µm from their centres. The treatment modality was either (i) a single MRT session of 401.23 Gy peak dose (7.40 Gy valley dose, i.e., dose between beams), or (ii) three MRT sessions of 133.41 Gy peak dose (2.46 Gy valley dose) delivered over 3 days in different anatomical planes, which intersected at 45 degrees. The mean dose rate was 12,750 Gy/s, with exposure times between 34.2 and 11.4 ms, respectively.

resultsTemporally fractionated MRT ablated 50% of B16-F10 mouse melanomas, preventing organ metastases and local tumour recurrence for 18 months. In the rest of the animals, the median survival increased by 2.5-fold in comparison to the single MRT session and by 4.1-fold with respect to untreated mice.

conclusionsTemporally fractionating MRT with lower peak doses not only maintained tumour control, but also increased the efficacy of this technique. These results demonstrate that the solution to making MRT more clinically feasible is to irradiate with several fractions of intersecting arrays with lower peak doses. This provides alternatives to synchrotron sources where future microbeam radiotherapy could be delivered with less intense radiation sources.

Indexed as

macrophagesmelanomamelanophagesmousespatial fractionated radiotherapysynchrotron microbeam radiation therapytemporal fractionation

Identifiers

PMID32957691
PMCPMC7563854
OpenAlexW3085274845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.