Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957687›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Childcare Food Provision Recommendations Vary across Australia: Jurisdictional Comparison and Nutrition Expert Perspectives.

Alison Spence, Penelope Love, Rebecca Byrne, Amy Wakem, Louisa Matwiejczyk, Amanda Devine, Rebecca Golley, Ros Sambell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Beyond Local Champions: Contextual Factors Shaping the Implementation of Healthy Eating Interventions in Centre-Based Care - A Qualitative Study With Educators and Cooks.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alison SpenceInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-1718
Penelope LoveInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1244-3947
Rebecca ByrneInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0096-3320
Amy WakemNutrition Australia Vic, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Louisa MatwiejczykCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7011-2206
Amanda DevineSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8928-8749
Rebecca GolleyCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5197-7987
Ros SambellSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-3441
Deakin University · AUEdith Cowan University · AUFlinders University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early childhood is a critical stage for nutrition promotion, and childcare settings have the potential for wide-reaching impact on food intake. There are currently no Australian national guidelines for childcare food provision, and the comparability of existing guidelines across jurisdictions is unknown. This project aimed to map and compare childcare food provision guidelines and to explore perspectives amongst early childhood nutrition experts for alignment of jurisdictional childcare food provision guidelines with the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG). A desktop review was conducted and formed the basis of an online survey. A national convenience sample of childhood nutrition experts was surveyed. Existing guideline recommendations for food group serving quantities were similar across jurisdictions but contained many minor differences. Of the 49 survey respondents, most (84-100%) agreed with aligning food group provision recommendations to provide at least 50% of the recommended ADG serves for children. Most (94%) agreed that discretionary foods should be offered less than once per month or never. Jurisdictional childcare food provision guidelines do not currently align, raising challenges for national accreditation and the provision of support and resources for services across jurisdictions. Childhood nutrition experts support national alignment of food provision guidelines with the ADG.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersFood ServicesNutrition PolicyAustraliaChildChild Nutrition SciencesChild, PreschoolDietFoodGuidelines as TopicHealth PromotionHumanschildcaredietary guidelinesearly childhood education and careinfantlong day carenutritionpreschooltoddler

Identifiers

PMID32957687
PMCPMC7558074
OpenAlexW3086611474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.