Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957662›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Circulating Cell-Free Nucleic Acids: Main Characteristics and Clinical Application.

Melinda Szilágyi, Ondrej Pös, Éva Márton, Gergely Buglyó, Beáta Soltész, Judit Keserű, András Penyige, Tomas Szemes, Bálint Nagy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A dexterous fluorescence sensor for diversified-biomarker detection using cyclic EDC-CHA (EDCHA) system.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melinda SzilágyiDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-2553
Ondrej PösDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, SK-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2491-2285
Éva MártonDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Gergely BuglyóDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Beáta SoltészDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Judit KeserűDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
András PenyigeDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1993-2014
Tomas SzemesDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, SK-841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Bálint NagyDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0295-185X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy recently became a very promising diagnostic method that has several advantages over conventional invasive methods. Liquid biopsy may serve as a source of several important biomarkers including cell-free nucleic acids (cf-NAs). Cf-DNA is widely used in prenatal testing in order to characterize fetal genetic disorders. Analysis of cf-DNA may provide information about the mutation profile of tumor cells, while cell-free non-coding RNAs are promising biomarker candidates in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Many of these markers have the potential to help clinicians in therapy selection and in the follow-up of patients. Thus, cf-NA-based diagnostics represent a new path in personalized medicine. Although several reviews are available in the field, most of them focus on a limited number of cf-NA types. In this review, we give an overview about all known cf-NAs including cf-DNA, cf-mtDNA and cell-free non-coding RNA (miRNA, lncRNA, circRNA, piRNA, YRNA, and vtRNA) by discussing their biogenesis, biological function and potential as biomarker candidates in liquid biopsy. We also outline possible future directions in the field.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, MitochondrialExosomesFemaleFetusHumansLiquid BiopsyMicroRNAsMutationPrecision MedicinePregnancyPrognosisRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, MitochondrialMicroRNAsRNA, Long Noncodingbiological fluidscell-free nucleic acidscircRNAexosomesliquid biopsylncRNAmiRNAmtDNAnDNA

Identifiers

PMID32957662
PMCPMC7555669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.