Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957598›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

AI Approaches Towards Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements: A Systematic Literature Review.

Muhammad Tausif Irshad, Muhammad Adeel Nisar, Philip Gouverneur, Marion Rapp, Marcin Grzegorzek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Tausif IrshadInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Muhammad Adeel NisarInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3288-750X
Philip GouverneurInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8610-2291
Marion RappClinic for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Marcin GrzegorzekInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-8287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General movements (GMs) are spontaneous movements of infants up to five months post-term involving the whole body varying in sequence, speed, and amplitude. The assessment of GMs has shown its importance for identifying infants at risk for neuromotor deficits, especially for the detection of cerebral palsy. As the assessment is based on videos of the infant that are rated by trained professionals, the method is time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, approaches based on Artificial Intelligence have gained significantly increased attention in the last years. In this article, we systematically analyze and discuss the main design features of all existing technological approaches seeking to transfer the Prechtl's assessment of general movements from an individual visual perception to computer-based analysis. After identifying their shared shortcomings, we explain the methodological reasons for their limited practical performance and classification rates. As a conclusion of our literature study, we conceptually propose a methodological solution to the defined problem based on the groundbreaking innovation in the area of Deep Learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCerebral PalsyHumansInfantMovementPublicationsVideotape Recordingartificial neural networkcerebral palsyfidgety movementsgeneral movement assessmentmachine learningmotion sensorsmultimodal sensingphysical activity assessmentvisual sensors

Identifiers

PMID32957598
PMCPMC7570604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.