Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957583›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Fungicide Resistance in Powdery Mildew Fungi.

Alejandra Vielba-Fernández, Álvaro Polonio, Laura Ruiz-Jiménez, Antonio de Vicente, Alejandro Pérez-García, Dolores Fernández-Ortuño

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandra Vielba-FernándezDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Álvaro PolonioDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4977-9305
Laura Ruiz-JiménezDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2147-358X
Antonio de VicenteDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2716-9861
Alejandro Pérez-GarcíaDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1065-0360
Dolores Fernández-OrtuñoDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powdery mildew fungi (Erysiphales) are among the most common and important plant fungal pathogens. These fungi are obligate biotrophic parasites that attack nearly 10,000 species of angiosperms, including major crops, such as cereals and grapes. Although cultural and biological practices may reduce the risk of infection by powdery mildew, they do not provide sufficient protection. Therefore, in practice, chemical control, including the use of fungicides from multiple chemical groups, is the most effective tool for managing powdery mildew. Unfortunately, the risk of resistance development is high because typical spray programs include multiple applications per season. In addition, some of the most economically destructive species of powdery mildew fungi are considered to be high-risk pathogens and are able to develop resistance to several chemical classes within a few years. This situation has decreased the efficacy of the major fungicide classes, such as sterol demethylation inhibitors, quinone outside inhibitors and succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, that are employed against powdery mildews. In this review, we present cases of reduction in sensitivity, development of resistance and failure of control by fungicides that have been or are being used to manage powdery mildew. In addition, the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to fungicides are also outlined. Finally, a number of recommendations are provided to decrease the probability of resistance development when fungicides are employed.

Indexed as

cross-resistancedisease controlfitness costfungicide resistancemolecular mechanisms of fungicide resistancepowdery mildewsresistance developmentresistance management

Identifiers

PMID32957583
PMCPMC7564317
OpenAlexW3087599158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.