ArticleMedicine2020
The efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture against urinary incontinence after stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing Family-Community Interactive program for the disabled older adults at home: a study protocol.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- The investigation of cognition, proprioception, sensory and physical function in stroke patients with urinary incontinence.International urology and nephrology · 2023Article
- A qualitative study of the interaction experiences between family caregivers and community nurses for disabled elderly people at home.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary incontinence (UI) is still a persistent challenge in many stroke survivors, affecting the quality of life and emotional being of these individuals. Numerous studies have demonstrated the curative effect of electroacupuncture on post-stroke incontinence, however they were mired with questionable quality and inconsistencies in safety and efficacy. Therefore, the main objective of this meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture against urinary incontinence after stroke, with a view of providing more reliable evidence-based solutions for UI.
methodsA systematic literature search will be conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases from inception to June 2020 to identify randomized control trials that report on electroacupuncture against urinary incontinence after stroke. Two reviewers will independently identify eligible studies and extract data. The risk of bias of the included randomized control trials will be evaluated according to the Cochrane tool. Risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals will be used to estimate the efficacy of treatment,. and the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. The statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated by Cochran's Q and the I. Data will be analyzed using Stata software (Version 13.0, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).
resultsThis study will provide a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture against UI after stroke, with a view of providing more reliable evidence-based solutions for UI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work synthesises evidence from previously published studies and does not require ethics review or approval. A manuscript describing the findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202050073.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.