Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957341›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Laparoscopic pancreaticodoudenectomy: An excellent approach in elderly patients, a multicenter, comparative study.

Maher Hendi, Yiping Mou, Chao Lu, Yu Pan, Bin Zhang, Ke Chen, Xiaowu Xu, Renchao Zhang, Yucheng Zhou, Weiwei Jin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maher HendiZhejiang University, School of Medicine.
Yiping MouZhejiang University, School of Medicine.
Chao LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pancreas Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital.
Yu PanZhejiang University, School of Medicine.
Bin ZhangZhejiang University, School of Medicine.
Ke ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaowu XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pancreas Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital.
Renchao ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pancreas Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital.
Yucheng ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pancreas Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital.
Weiwei JinZhejiang University, School of Medicine.
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNZhejiang University · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of malignant diseases in elderly patients has become a global clinical issue because of increased life expectancy worldwide. Advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have reduced age-related contraindications for LPD. Past articles have reported that elderly patients undergoing laproscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) are at an increased risk compared to younger patients. The aim of this article is to compare a multicenter center risk of LPD in elderly and nonelderly patients.

methodsRetrospective review (n = 237) of perisurgical outcomes in patients undergoing LPD during the months of September 2012 to December 2017. Outcomes in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) were compared with those in nonelderly patients.

resultsTransfer to ICU was more frequent in elderly patients (odds ratio [OR] 6.49, P = .001) and the mean hospital stay was longer (21.4 days compared with 16.6 days), (P = .0033) than for nonelderly patients. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time (P = .494), estimated blood loss (P = .0519), blood transfusion (P = .863), decreased gastric emptying (P = .397), abdominal pain (P = .454), food intake (P = .241), time to self-ambulation (P = 1), reoperation (P = .543), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (P = .454), POPF grade B (P = .736), POPF grade C (P = .164), hemorrhage (P = .319), bile leakage (P = .428), infection (P = .259), GI bleeding (P = .286), morbidity (P = .272) or mortality (P = .449) between the 2 groups.

conclusionsElderly patients who underwent LPD in this study had good overall outcomes after LPD that were similar to young patients. The perioperative and long-term outcomes of LPD are not worse. Rates of ICU admission and hospital stays increased in elderly patients undergoing LPD when compared with nonelderly ones. LPD can be performed on elderly patients with similar outcomes as younger patients; therefore, age itself should not be a contraindication for LPD for pancreatic cancer, but it suggests that elderly patients with comorbidities should be more stringently selected for surgery.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChinaCritical CareFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMalePancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32957341
PMCPMC7505399
OpenAlexW3087234500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.