Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957334›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Effect of different form of upper limb muscles training on dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A study protocol.

Marc Beaumont, Loic Péran, Anne Cécile Berriet, Catherine Le Ber, Patricia Le Mevel, Emmanuelle Courtois-Communier, Francis Couturaud

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03611036 (Effect of Different Form of Upper Limb Muscles Training on Dyspnea in COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03611036 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Different Form of Upper Limb Muscles Training on Dyspnea in COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BrestRan2018 to 2023Enrolled280ConditionsCOPDArmsStrength training, Endurance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc BeaumontPulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Morlaix Hospital Centre, Morlaix.ORCID 0000-0003-2354-349
Loic PéranPulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Morlaix Hospital Centre, Morlaix.
Anne Cécile BerrietPulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Morlaix Hospital Centre, Morlaix.
Catherine Le BerPulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Morlaix Hospital Centre, Morlaix.
Patricia Le MevelPulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Morlaix Hospital Centre, Morlaix.
Emmanuelle Courtois-CommunierINSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1412, University Hospital of Brest.
Francis CouturaudDepartment of Internal Medicine and Chest Diseases, EA3878 (GETBO), CIC INSERM 1412, University Hospital of Brest, European University of Occidental Brittany, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn activities involving upper limbs, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) report an increase in dyspnea. For this reason, the authors of the recommendations about pulmonary rehabilitation propose to perform upper limbs muscle strengthening in patients with COPD. However, the modalities of strengthening are not clearly established.The aim of this study is to compare the effects of upper limbs endurance strengthening versus upper limbs force strengthening, in patients with COPD during a pulmonary rehabilitation program.

methodsThis study is a randomized, open-label, bi-center controlled trial in parallel groups distributed in a ratio (1:1) comparing upper limbs force strengthening (group F) to the upper limbs endurance strengthening (group E) during a pulmonary rehabilitation program in patients with COPD stages 2 to 4 (A-D).After randomization, patients will be allocated to follow: A 4 weeks pulmonary rehabilitation program with upper limbs resistance strengthening (group F). A 4 weeks pulmonary rehabilitation program with upper limbs endurance strengthening (group E).The primary outcome is dyspnea measured with the London Chest Activity of daily Living questionnaire. The secondary outcomes are dyspnea (using Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea Scale, dyspnea-12 questionnaire, multidimensional dyspnea profile questionnaire), upper limb exercise capacity (using the 6-minute Peg Board and Ring Test), Maximal voluntary strength of deltoid, biceps, and brachial triceps.The sample size calculated is 140 patients per group, or 280 in total. DISCUSSION: The modalities of upper limb strengthening are not very well known, and evidence based is lacking to recommend endurance or resistance upper limb strengthening.We anticipate that the results of this study will be of relevance to clinical practice. They will bring information about the best modality of upper limb strengthening to use during a pulmonary rehabilitation program.

trial registrationIdRCB n°2018-A00955-50; V1.1 du 11/07/2018; REHABSUP, clinical trial.gov (NCT03611036), registered August 02, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03611036.

Indexed as

Upper ExtremityDyspneaHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicMuscle StrengthPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance Training

Identifiers

PMID32957334
PMCPMC7505400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.