Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957318›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

Equimolar doses of hypertonic agents (saline or mannitol) in the treatment of intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury.

Xuecai Huang, Lingling Yang, Jinping Ye, Shike He, Baoping Wang

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Food sweeteners: Angels or clowns for human health?Current research in food science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xuecai HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lishui Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Lingling YangHealth examination center, Lishui Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Jinping YeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lishui Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Shike HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lishui Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Baoping WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lishui Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Zhejiang University · CNLishui Central Hospital · CNLishui University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMannitol and hypertonic saline (HTS) are effective in reducing intracranial pressure (ICP) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, their efficacy on the ICP has not been evaluated rigorously.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of repeated bolus dosing of HTS and mannitol in similar osmotic burdens to treat intracranial hypertension (ICH) in patients with severe TBI.

methodsThe authors used an alternating treatment protocol to evaluate the efficacy of HTS with that of mannitol given for ICH episodes in patients treated for severe TBI at their hospital during 2017 to 2019. Doses of similar osmotic burdens (20% mannitol, 2 ml/kg, or 10% HTS, 0.63 ml/kg, administered as a bolus via a central venous catheter, infused over 15 minutes) were given alternately to the individual patient with severe TBI during ICH episodes. The choice of osmotic agents for the treatment of the initial ICH episode was determined on a randomized basis; osmotic agents were alternated for every subsequent ICH episode in each individual patient. intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were continuously monitored between the beginning of each osmotherapy and the return of ICP to 20 mm Hg. The duration of the effect of ICP reduction (between the beginning of osmotherapy and the return of ICP to 20 mm Hg), the maximum reduction of ICP and its time was recorded after each dose. Serum sodium and plasma osmolality were measured before, 0.5 hours and 3 hours after each dose. Adverse effects such as central pontine myelinolysis (CPM), severe fluctuations of serum sodium and plasma osmolality were assessed to evaluate the safety of repeated dosing of HTS and mannitol.

resultsEighty three patients with severe TBI were assessed, including 437 ICH episodes, receiving 236 doses of HTS and 221 doses of mannitol totally. There was no significant difference between equimolar HTS and mannitol boluses on the magnitude of ICP reduction, the duration of effect, and the time to lowest ICP achieved (P > .05). The proportion of efficacious boluses was higher for HTS than for mannitol (P = .016), as was the increase in serum sodium (P = .038). The serum osmolality increased immediately after osmotherapy with a significant difference (P = .017). No cases of CPM were detected.

conclusionRepeat bolus dosing of 10% HTS and 20% mannitol appears to be significantly and similarly effective for treating ICH in patients with severe TBI. The proportion of efficacious doses of HTS on ICP reduction may be higher than mannitol.

Indexed as

AdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebrovascular CirculationDiuretics, OsmoticFemaleHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureMaleMannitolMiddle AgedSaline Solution, HypertonicTrauma Severity IndicesDiuretics, OsmoticMannitolSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID32957318
PMCPMC7505304
OpenAlexW3087401428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.