Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32956934›Full record

Trial reportBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020

Initial experience with CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies compared to antihormone monotherapies in routine clinical use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer - Data from the PRAEGNANT research network for the first 2 years of drug availability in Germany.

Andreas Schneeweiss, Johannes Ettl, Diana Lüftner, Matthias W Beckmann, Erik Belleville, Peter A Fasching, Tanja N Fehm, Matthias Geberth, Lothar Häberle, Peyman Hadji and 24 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes EttlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Diana LüftnerCharité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncolo0gy and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Erik BellevilleClinSol GmbH & Co KG, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter A FaschingErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. Electronic address: peter.fasching@uk-erlangen.de.
Tanja N FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Germany.
Matthias GeberthGynäkologische Praxisklinik Am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany.
Lothar HäberleErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen, Germany.
Peyman HadjiFrankfurt Center of Bone Health Frankfurt, Germany.
Andreas D HartkopfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Carsten HielscherGSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.
Jens HuoberDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Eugen RuckhäberleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Hans Christian KolbergMarienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany.
Christian M KurbacherGynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynäkologisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.
Evelyn KleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael P LuxErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerDepartment of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Naiba NabievaErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Friedrich OverkampOncologianova GmbH, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Hans TeschOncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Elena LaakmannDepartment of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Julia SeitzNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph ThomssenDepartment of Gynecology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Michael UntchDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Pauline WimbergerNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, Germany.
Bernhard VolzErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Diethelm WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DECardiovascular Center Bethanien · DECardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DELMU Klinikum · DEMarienhospital Bottrop · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i + ET) is a standard for patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR + HER2-) breast cancer (BC). However, real-world data on the implementation of therapy usage, efficacy, and toxicity have not yet been reported.

methodsThe PRAEGNANT registry was used to identify advanced HR + HER2- BC patients (n = 1136). The use of chemotherapy, ET, everolimus + ET, and CDK4/6i + ET was analyzed for first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also compared between patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy. Also toxicity was assessed.

resultsCDK4/6i + ET use increased from 38.5% to 62.7% in the first 2 years after CDK4/6i treatment became available (November 2016). Chemotherapy and ET monotherapy use decreased from 2015 to 2018 from 42.2% to 27.2% and from 53% to 9.5%, respectively. In this early analysis no statistically significant differences were found comparing CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy patients with regard to PFS and OS. Leukopenia was was seen in 11.3% of patients under CDK4/6i + ET and 0.5% under ET monotherapy.

conclusionsIn clinical practice, CDK4/6i + ET has been rapidly implemented. A group of patients with a more unfavorable prognosis was possibly treated in the real-world setting than in the reported randomized clinical trials. The available data suggest that longer follow-up times and a larger sample size are required in order to identify differences in survival outcomes. Studies should be supported that investigate whether chemotherapy can be avoided or delayed in this patient population by using CDK4/6i + ET.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGermanyHumansProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAbemaciclibAdvanced breast cancerCDK4/6ChemotherapyEndocrine therapyMetastaticPalbociclibRibociclib

Identifiers

PMID32956934
PMCPMC7509062
OpenAlexW3082552926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.