Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32956888›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2021

Telemedicine via Smart Glasses in Critical Care of the Neurosurgical Patient-COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness and Response in Neurosurgery.

Thangaraj Munusamy, Ravindran Karuppiah, Nor Faizal A Bahuri, Sutharshan Sockalingam, Chun Yoong Cham, Vicknes Waran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Towards Wearable Augmented Reality in Healthcare: A Comparative Survey and Analysis of Head-Mounted Displays.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thangaraj MunusamyDivision of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ravindran KaruppiahDivision of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nor Faizal A BahuriDivision of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sutharshan SockalingamDivision of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chun Yoong ChamDivision of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Vicknes WaranDivision of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: cmvwaran@gmail.com.
University of Malaya · MYUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic poses major risks to health care workers in neurocritical care. Recommendations are in place to limit medical personnel attending to the neurosurgical patient as a protective measure and to conserve personal protective equipment. However, the complexity of the neurosurgical patient proves to be a challenge and an opportunity for innovation. The goal of our study was to determine if telemedicine delivered through smart glasses was feasible and effective in an alternative method of conducting ward round on neurocritical care patients during the pandemic.

methodsA random pair of neurosurgery resident and specialist conducted consecutive virtual and physical ward rounds on neurocritical patients. A virtual ward round was first conducted remotely by a specialist who received real-time audiovisual information from a resident wearing smart glasses integrated with telemedicine. Subsequently, a physical ward round was performed together by the resident and specialist on the same patient. The management plans of both ward rounds were compared, and the intrarater reliability was measured. On study completion a qualitative survey was performed.

resultsTen paired ward rounds were performed on 103 neurocritical care patients with excellent overall intrarater reliability. Nine out of 10 showed good to excellent internal consistency, and 1 showed acceptable internal consistency. Qualitative analysis indicated wide user acceptance and high satisfaction rate with the alternative method.

conclusionsVirtual ward rounds using telemedicine via smart glasses on neurosurgical patients in critical care were feasible, effective, and widely accepted as an alternative to physical ward rounds during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsSmart GlassesCritical CareDelivery of Health CareFeasibility StudiesHumansNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsTelemedicineCritical careNeurosurgeryPandemicSmart glassesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32956888
PMCPMC7500328
OpenAlexW3087184865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.