Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32956490›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register.

Linnea V Ladfors, Giulia M Muraca, Alexander Butwick, Gustaf Edgren, Olof Stephansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linnea V LadforsClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine - Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9417-6936
Giulia M MuracaClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine - Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander ButwickDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gustaf EdgrenClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine - Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof StephanssonClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine - Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1528-4563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population-wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD-10) was introduced in Sweden in 1997, the accuracy of ICD-10 codes for PPH is not known. Thus, the aim was to determine the accuracy of diagnostic coding for PPH in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 609 807 deliveries in Sweden between 2014 and 2019. Information on ICD-10 codes for PPH and estimated blood loss were extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Using an estimated blood loss >1000 mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ICD-10 codes for PPH by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In our secondary analysis, we assessed the ICD-10 coding accuracy for severe PPH, defined as an estimated blood loss >1000 mL and transfusion of at least 1 unit of red blood cells registered in the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusion database.

resultsOf the 609 807 deliveries, 43 312 (7.1%) had an ICD-10 code for PPH and 45 071 (7.4%) had an estimated blood loss >1000 mL. The ICD codes had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 88.2-88.7), specificity of 99.4% (95% CI 99.4-99.4), positive predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI 91.8-92.3) and negative predictive value of 99.1% (95% CI 99.1-99.1). In our secondary analysis, on deliveries with severe PPH, the sensitivity for an ICD code was 91.3% (95% CI 90.7-91.9), whereas specificity was 83.5% (95% CI 82.3-84.6).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that ICD-10 codes for PPH in Sweden have moderately high sensitivity and excellent specificity. These results suggest that PPH diagnostic codes in medical records and linked pregnancy and birth registers can be used for research, quality improvement and reporting PPH prevalence in Sweden.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesRegistriesAdultCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHumansPostpartum HemorrhagePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenYoung Adultblood transfusioncesarean sectiondata accuracydeliveryobstetricpostpartum hemorrhagesensitivity and specificitythird labor stagevalidation study

Identifiers

PMID32956490
PMCPMC7891624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.