Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32956427›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A tissue engineering approach for repairing craniofacial volumetric muscle loss in a sheep following a 2, 4, and 6-month recovery.

Brittany L Rodriguez, Emmanuel E Vega-Soto, Christopher S Kennedy, Matthew H Nguyen, Paul S Cederna, Lisa M Larkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Secondary denervation is a chronic pathophysiologic sequela of volumetric muscle loss.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany L RodriguezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3738-520X
Emmanuel E Vega-SotoDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Christopher S KennedyDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Matthew H NguyenDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Paul S CedernaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Lisa M LarkinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Utilization of Engineered Skeletal Muscle Units to Repair Volumetric MuscleR01AR067744 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LARKIN, LISA M · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is the loss of skeletal muscle that results in significant and persistent impairment of function. The unique characteristics of craniofacial muscle compared trunk and limb skeletal muscle, including differences in gene expression, satellite cell phenotype, and regenerative capacity, suggest that VML injuries may affect craniofacial muscle more severely. However, despite these notable differences, there are currently no animal models of craniofacial VML. In a previous sheep hindlimb VML study, we showed that our lab's tissue engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) were able to restore muscle force production to a level that was statistically indistinguishable from the uninjured contralateral muscle. Thus, the goals of this study were to: 1) develop a model of craniofacial VML in a large animal model and 2) to evaluate the efficacy of our SMUs in repairing a 30% VML in the ovine zygomaticus major muscle. Overall, there was no significant difference in functional recovery between the SMU-treated group and the unrepaired control. Despite the use of the same injury and repair model used in our previous study, results showed differences in pathophysiology between craniofacial and hindlimb VML. Specifically, the craniofacial model was affected by concomitant denervation and ischemia injuries that were not exhibited in the hindlimb model. While clinically realistic, the additional ischemia and denervation likely created an injury that was too severe for our SMUs to repair. This study highlights the importance of balancing the use of a clinically realistic model while also maintaining control over variables related to the severity of the injury. These variables include the volume of muscle removed, the location of the VML injury, and the geometry of the injury, as these affect both the muscle's ability to self-regenerate as well as the probability of success of the treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFaceFacial InjuriesFacial MusclesFemaleGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansMaleMuscular DiseasesRecovery of FunctionRegenerationSheepTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID32956427
PMCPMC7505427
OpenAlexW3087240974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.