Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32956167›Full record

SynthesisCardiology in review

Clinical Burden and Unmet Need in Recurrent Pericarditis: A Systematic Literature Review.

Allan Klein, Paul Cremer, Apostolos Kontzias, Muhammad Furqan, Anna Forsythe, Christopher Crotty, Michelle Lim-Watson, Matthew Magestro

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiology in review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. AFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Brief Overview of Recurrent Pericarditis Management and the Potential of Rilonacept as a New Therapeutic Option.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allan KleinFrom the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Paul CremerFrom the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Apostolos KontziasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Center of Autoinflammatory Diseases, State University of New York Stonybrook, New York, NY.
Muhammad FurqanFrom the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Anna ForsythePurple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY.
Christopher CrottyPurple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY.
Michelle Lim-WatsonValue and Access, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Lexington, MA.
Matthew MagestroValue and Access, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Lexington, MA.
Cleveland Clinic · USState University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation of the pericardium (pericarditis) is characterized by excruciating chest pain. This systematic literature review summarizes clinical, humanistic, and economic burdens in acute, especially recurrent, pericarditis, with a secondary aim of understanding United States treatment patterns and outcomes. Short-term clinical burden is well characterized, but long-term data are limited. Some studies report healthcare resource utilization and economic impact; none measure health-related quality-of-life. Pericarditis is associated with infrequent but potentially life-threatening complications, including cardiac tamponade (weighted average: 12.7% across 10 studies), constrictive pericarditis (1.84%; 9 studies), and pericardial effusion (54.7%; 16 studies). There are no approved pericarditis treatments; treatment guidelines, when available, are inconsistent on treatment course or duration. Most recommend first-line use of conventional treatments, for example, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with or without colchicine; however, 15-30% of patients experience recurrence. Second-line therapy may involve conventional therapies plus long-term utilization of corticosteroids, despite safety issues and the difficulty of tapering or discontinuation. Other exploratory therapies (eg, azathioprine, immunoglobulin, methotrexate, anakinra) present steroid-sparing options, but none are supported by robust clinical evidence, and some present tolerability challenges that may impact adherence. Pericardiectomy is occasionally pursued in treatment-refractory patients, although data are limited. This lack of an evidence-based treatment pathway for patients with recurrent disease is reflected in readmission rates, for example, 12.2% at 30 days in 1 US study. Patients with continued recurrence and inadequate treatment response need approved, safe, accessible treatments to resolve pericarditis symptoms and reduce recurrence risk without excessive treatment burden.

Indexed as

Pericardial EffusionPericarditisAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChest PainHumansUnited StatesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID32956167
PMCPMC8812421
OpenAlexW3087085444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.